Executive Project Reports Software
There's no separate executive product here, just the owner command center, which happens to be exactly the roll-up a company leader is usually asking someone else to build.
One honest note before this page continues
Plenty of software sells an "executive reporting" tier as if leadership needs a fundamentally different product from everyone else, complete with its own dashboards, its own branding, and usually its own line item on the invoice. ShipSprint doesn't have one of those, and we'd rather say so than imply otherwise, even on a page whose keyword is asking us to. What a company leader gets is the owner command center, the same cross-team view described elsewhere on this site, presented here for the reader who specifically needs the roll-up rather than any single team's board.
That's not a downgrade from some imagined executive edition. It's the same live data every manager's dashboard draws from, aggregated up to the level a leader actually operates at: every team, one screen, no one assembling it by hand.
If you run a company on ShipSprint, you already have this. If you're evaluating ShipSprint specifically because someone needs to answer to a founder, a board, or an investor about how delivery is actually going, this is the page that speaks to that, not a promise of something more elaborate waiting behind a higher price.
The honesty here is deliberate rather than a hedge. A vendor that invents a distinct "executive" product usually does it to justify a distinct, higher price for the same underlying data, repackaged with different fonts. We'd rather you know exactly what you're buying: one live view of the company, priced per seat regardless of whose seat it is.
It also means a leader evaluating ShipSprint is evaluating the same product their teams will actually use day to day, not a polished sales demo layered on top of something rougher underneath. If the command center looks credible during a trial, it's because it's built from the same board data a project manager three levels down is staring at that same morning, not a separate dataset curated to look good for the person signing the contract.
That also means the trial is a fair test. A 14-day trial with a sample project preloaded shows the command center exactly as it will look once real teams are on it. Nobody polishes a demo version differently from the production one, because there isn't a second version to polish.
The roll-up, not the detail underneath it
The same six things any owner opening the command center sees, described for the reader who needs the summary layer specifically.
Status across all projects and departments at once, so "where are we" doesn't require pinging five managers and waiting for five replies.
Delivery forecasts recalculated from measured velocity as sprints close, so a slipping date surfaces weeks ahead, while there's still time to reallocate people or renegotiate scope.
Who's over capacity and where hours actually went, rolled up across every team, drawn from the five-second logs people file next to their own tasks.
A summary lands Monday morning automatically, which covers the "how was last week across the company" question without a standing status call to get it.
Engineering, HR, marketing and operations each run their own templates and vocabulary on the same system, so the roll-up is genuinely company-wide, not engineering-plus-guesses.
Every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, admin actions are logged, and the whole workspace exports as JSON any time, plus SSO on Business.
Why this is still the right screen for a leader
The instinct behind wanting a separate "executive report" usually isn't wanting different data, it's wanting less of it, pre-filtered to what matters at the top. The command center does that filtering by construction: it's built at the roll-up level, not assembled by drilling into forty individual boards and squinting for patterns. A leader opening it sees risk and capacity across the company; a manager opening their own team view sees the operational detail behind any one of those numbers, if they need to go look.
It also means a leader's picture and a manager's picture never quietly disagree, because they're the same data at two zoom levels rather than two separately maintained reports that drift apart the moment nobody's cross-checking them. That's the real value of running this on ShipSprint rather than a bolt-on reporting layer: the number in the board deck and the number the team is actually working against are, by construction, the same number.
The board-meeting version of "how's delivery going"
A founder walking into a board meeting usually wants three things: which commitments are on track, which aren't and why, and whether the company can take on more. The command center answers the first two directly: projects flagged at risk, with the velocity trend behind each flag. The third is closer to a judgment call, but capacity and workload across every team, adjusted for leave, is the honest input to make that call with, rather than a guess based on how busy everyone seems in the hallway.
None of it requires briefing anyone beforehand. Open the command center the morning of the meeting and it reflects that morning, not last month's snapshot someone forgot to update.
It's also worth being clear about the boundary here, since this page is written for a reader who cares about what's really underneath the summary. The command center will tell a leader which projects are at risk and roughly why: velocity dropped, or WIP is queuing at a stage. It won't tell them whether that's because a client keeps changing requirements, a key engineer is quietly job-hunting, or the original estimate was simply wrong. Those are conversations, not dashboard rows, and the command center's job is narrowing down which conversations are worth having this week.
Getting a company-wide view running
- Every team already on ShipSprint feeds the command center automatically, there's no separate reporting setup or export step.
- Ask it directly, in plain language, through the Claude or ChatGPT connection, "which projects are at risk this month," without opening a single board.
- Available on the Business plan, which every paid signup can trial in full for 14 days, sample project included, no card required.
- Billing is per seat, in rupees, with GST-compliant invoices, a detail that matters more at this level of a purchasing decision than it does further down the org chart.
Common questions
No, there's one owner command center, on the Business plan, and it's what a company leader would use for a cross-team view. We're not going to sell you a differently branded product that's really the same screen with a higher price on it.
The whole workspace exports as JSON at any time if you need the raw data. For a live view during the meeting itself, opening the command center directly tends to hold up better than a static export, since it's already current and nobody has to reconcile it with what changed since the export was taken.
Yes. Every department runs on the same system with its own templates and vocabulary, and all of it rolls into the same command center, so the company-wide view is actually company-wide.
Every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, and admin actions are written to an audit log. SSO is available on Business. Details are on the security page, and plan specifics are on pricing.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in Hyderabad. Billing is per seat in Indian rupees with GST-compliant invoices, and annual billing is available for teams that prefer to budget that way.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required