Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Bogotá
A Bogotá team that doubled headcount in eighteen months usually finds its old habits, a group chat standing in for a real board, stop working right when growth gets real. ShipSprint's boards get status from GitHub, not from someone remembering to update a card.
Growth outpaces a board before anyone notices
A fast-growing Bogotá engineering team, often selling abroad well before its own internal processes caught up, tends to notice the gap in the same place: new requests arrive faster than anyone can triage them, and a card sits in "in progress" long after the branch behind it merged, because dragging it across a column stopped being anyone's clear job once the team tripled in size. A burndown chart built on that lag was never trustworthy, and fast growth just makes the gap between the chart and reality wider, faster.
That's a structural problem, not a discipline one. A team growing that quickly has less spare attention for board hygiene, not more, exactly when accurate status matters most.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly instead of asking a stretched team to keep up with manual updates. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so the chart stays accurate through the exact growth spurt that would otherwise break it.
Built around merge history, not memory
Structure that catches up with growth, not the other way round.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required from a team that's already stretched thin.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so the board tracks the code even as the team triples in size.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, staying accurate through fast growth.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox catch new requests before they pile up in someone's messages, whoever that someone now is.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own completed sprints, so a date at risk surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo, a cost that lands hardest on a company that added headcount faster than it added managers, since there may not be a dedicated lead with time to do that reconciliation properly. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step disappears, and someone actually knows the answer instead of having to go find out.
A built-in wiki helps with the same growth problem from another angle: decisions made in week one don't vanish once the two people who made them are outnumbered by new hires, since the reasoning sits next to the work it shaped, with page history intact. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, a plain fact about invoicing rather than a claim to being local. Support runs on Indian hours, well removed from Colombia time, and forecasts and the digest generate themselves so a fast-growing team doesn't need synchronous support to keep moving.
Questions from Bogotá dev teams
That's specifically the case it's built for. Because cards move and close based on GitHub activity rather than someone remembering to update a field, the board stays accurate through fast headcount growth without anyone needing to keep pace manually.
No. Engineering gets the deepest tooling, but HR, marketing and operations run on the same subscription with their own templates and vocabulary, so a fast-growing services business isn't left running three different tools.
No, by design. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work delivered and hours logged by the person who worked them, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required