Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Chennai
OMR's engineering floors run sprints next to a city that measures lateness in stopped production lines. ShipSprint builds the board from the commit, not the standup.
A sprint board that can't afford to be a guess
Chennai's engineering corridor along OMR sits inside a city where a missed deadline elsewhere, a supplier delivery to the automotive plants further out, can idle a production line the same day. Software teams here don't carry that exact stake, but they inherit the culture around it: a general impatience with any status that isn't actually true, and a low tolerance for a burndown chart that turns out to be a guess dressed up as a number.
Most burndown charts are exactly that guess, because they depend on an engineer remembering to drag a card the moment a fix ships, in between the actual work of shipping it. A card sitting in "In Progress" after the branch already merged isn't a red flag, it's just what happens when updating a board loses out to finishing the task. The result is a sprint review that opens with someone quietly checking GitHub before saying anything out loud, because nobody quite trusts what's on screen.
ShipSprint removes the step that goes missing. A branch tied to a card moves it across the board automatically the moment it's opened, and a merged pull request closes the card without anyone touching a field. The burndown and cycle-time numbers an OMR engineering lead pulls up midweek come from that same merge history, not from whoever remembered to update something before standup.
What actually changes on an engineering board
None of this asks a Chennai dev team to run a second process alongside the one it's already running in GitHub.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances across the board automatically, with nobody stopping mid-fix to update a field.
A merged pull request closes the card it belongs to, so "done" on the board actually means the code is in, not that someone said so.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from actual merges, not from a chart redrawn by hand before a client call.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits and new requests land in a triage inbox instead of an engineer's inbox, so a sprint is planned against real capacity.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace as sprints close, so a slipping date surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that opens with a number, not a scramble
A Friday review on most Chennai engineering floors starts the same way: somebody pulls up the board, finds half of it doesn't match reality, and spends the first ten minutes correcting a chart nobody trusted before the actual conversation can begin. That reconciliation, not the missed cards themselves, is the real tax a manually updated board charges every single sprint.
When the board reads directly off GitHub activity, that correction disappears. A lead checking the burndown chart on a Wednesday is looking at what merged, not at what someone remembered to click before lunch. That gap between "what the board says" and "what the repo says" only widens as a team grows, because more engineers means more people too deep in the work to think about card hygiene at the exact moment it matters.
None of that comes at the cost of watching people more closely. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking anywhere in the product. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe, built from what shipped and the hours logged, not from a manager's read of who looked busy on a given afternoon. ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in Hyderabad, so billing runs in rupees with GST-compliant invoices and support sits under Indian law and inside Indian business hours.
Questions from Chennai dev teams
It sits on top. Branches and pull requests work exactly as they do today. ShipSprint reads that activity to move cards and generate burndown and cycle-time analytics, so the board tracks the codebase instead of trailing behind it.
Yes, billing is in rupees with GST-compliant invoices, and annual billing is available. Quoted prices exclude applicable taxes.
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking, only work outcomes: what merged and the hours the person logs themselves. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible only to the person they describe.
Free covers up to five users and two projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required