Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Mexico City
A newly hired nearshore team reporting into a head office elsewhere has to prove its own pace without anyone there to watch it work. ShipSprint's boards prove it with GitHub merge history, not a card someone forgot to drag.
A head office can't see the work, only the board
A Mexico City nearshore engineering team, often hired quickly and reporting into a head office elsewhere, doesn't have the option of a manager wandering by to confirm progress the informal way. The board is the whole picture, which makes it a real problem that boards fail the same quiet way everywhere: an engineer finishes a task, moves to the next one, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority. A head office reading that stale board draws exactly the wrong conclusion at exactly the wrong time, usually while still deciding whether the new team is actually pulling its weight.
That risk is sharper for a newly formed team still building trust with people who aren't in the room to see the work directly. The board isn't just a planning tool here, it's the evidence.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so the board a head office checks reflects the actual code, not a status field somebody forgot to update on a busy day.
Built around merge history, not memory
A board that speaks for itself, useful when the audience reading it isn't in the building.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so a head office sees exactly what shipped, not what someone remembered to click.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build from actual merge history, real evidence for a team still proving its own pace.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox keep new requests planned against real capacity, visible without a status call.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own completed sprints, not an estimate someone committed to on day one.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with a lead reconciling the board against the repo before the actual conversation, and that reconciliation is a genuine liability when the same numbers feed directly into a report a head office reads without the chance to ask follow-up questions in person. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step disappears, and a weekly digest lands on its own without a local lead compiling it every Friday.
A built-in wiki keeps architecture decisions next to the work they affect, with page history, useful when a head office wants to understand why something was built a particular way, not just that it shipped. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, which is simply how invoicing works here, not a claim to a local presence. Support runs on Indian hours, a long way from Mexico City time, and forecasts and the digest generate themselves precisely so a nearshore team doesn't depend on a live call to keep moving.
Questions from Mexico City dev teams
Yes. The owner command center rolls up forecasts and burndown built from real merge history, so a head office can check status directly rather than waiting on a local lead to compile something, and the Monday digest arrives on its own without anyone building it by hand.
It suits a nearshore team's need to show its own pace clearly, since forecasts come from measured velocity rather than a promised date, but it isn't nearshoring-specific software. HR, marketing and operations run on the same subscription with their own templates.
No, by design. It skips screenshots, keystroke logging and activity tracking entirely, tracking only the work and hours each person logs on their own, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
The Free tier permanently covers 5 users and 2 projects. Team pricing is ₹299 per user per month, for up to 40 users. Business runs ₹599 per user per month, and layers in forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. The pricing page has the full breakdown.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required