Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Lisbon
Lisbon engineering teams are often a mix of local hires, relocated engineers and remote contractors, and a sprint board that depends on a shared standup doesn't hold up across that spread.
An engineering team with no shared commute to fall back on
When Web Summit moved from Dublin to Lisbon in 2016, it accelerated something that was already underway: a wave of founders, remote workers and relocating engineers who found Lisbon's cost of living and Atlantic-facing location a genuinely competitive offer against London, Berlin or Amsterdam. The engineering team that results is rarely built the way a team in a smaller, more homogeneous city is, it's a mix of local hires, people who moved here specifically for the job, and remote contractors who've never set foot in the office. There's less shared context to fall back on when a status update is missing, no "everyone just knows what's going on" to compensate.
A manually updated sprint board depends on exactly that shared context to stay accurate, someone noticing a colleague's card is stale, a habit built from working alongside the same people every day. A newer, more internationally mixed team hasn't had time to build that habit yet, and the board suffers for it: cards drift, and the burndown chart built on top of them stops meaning much.
ShipSprint doesn't depend on shared context to work. A GitHub branch tied to a card advances it automatically, and a merged pull request closes it, so the burndown a Lisbon engineering lead pulls up is accurate whether the team's been working together for years or the newest hire started last week.
What actually keeps the board honest
Opening a branch tied to a task advances it on the board automatically, no shared context or long working history with a teammate required to keep it accurate.
A merged pull request closes its card by itself, so a remote contractor's work is reflected correctly whether or not they've ever joined a live standup.
Cycle-time and burndown charts build themselves from commit and merge activity, giving a mixed local-and-remote team one accurate picture, not one shaped by who's easiest to reach.
Delivery forecasts recalculate from the team's own pace as sprints close, so a date drifting off track surfaces weeks early, whatever mix of time zones the team is spread across.
Decisions live next to the work they affect, with page history, useful when the person who made a call in week three might be the only one who remembers why, three months later.
A sprint review that doesn't need everyone in one room
A sprint review that requires the whole team live to be trustworthy doesn't work for a team where a designer might be three time zones away from an engineer and neither one is wrong about what "normal working hours" means. When burndown is already built from merge history, the review's accuracy doesn't depend on attendance: a lead can open the board hours before or after the sprint closed and see exactly what happened, because none of it was ever narrated live.
That matters directly for hiring here too. A candidate deciding between offers in a genuinely international market is more likely to ask how they'll be measured than a candidate hired locally through a network of people who already know how the company operates, and "the board reflects what you merged, not who remembered to update it" is a straightforward answer to give.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India, and billed per seat in rupees, with annual billing available. That's a fact about the company, not a claim of a Portuguese or EU entity behind it. Every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, and admin actions are logged.
Questions from Lisbon dev teams
Yes. Because status comes from real branch and merge activity rather than a status meeting, a remote contractor's work is reflected correctly regardless of whether they've ever attended a live call with the rest of the team.
No. ShipSprint is built and operated by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India, and billed per seat in rupees with annual billing available. Prices exclude any local taxes that apply to your purchase.
Yes. The Free plan covers five users and two projects permanently, and nothing about the paid tiers assumes a large team. The WIP limits and forecasts tend to matter earlier in a company's life, not later.
Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards, SSO and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required