Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Madrid
Madrid's larger engineering organisations report status up through several layers before it reaches a board that meets on a fixed schedule, and a manually updated sprint board loses accuracy at every layer.
An engineering team's status, filtered before it reaches the board
Walk down Paseo de la Castellana and you pass the towers that house Spain's largest listed companies, within a few blocks of the Bolsa de Madrid and the ministries that regulate them. Madrid's engineering work sits inside that structure more often than a leaner Barcelona startup's does: bigger organisations, a programme lead between the engineering team and the board, a report that gets built by hand before every review from whichever team remembered to update its tracker. Each layer that report passes through is a chance for the real status to drift a little further from what's actually true.
A manually maintained sprint board makes that drift worse at the source. If a card's position depends on an engineer remembering to update it before a status meeting, the number a programme lead reports upward is already once removed from reality, and the summary that reaches a board meeting is further removed still. Nobody's being dishonest, the information has just degraded on the way up through the organisation.
ShipSprint stops the degradation where it starts. A GitHub branch tied to a card advances it automatically, and a merged pull request closes it, so the burndown and cycle-time analytics visible to an engineer, a programme lead and a department head are the same numbers, built from the same real merge history.
What actually keeps the board honest
Opening a branch tied to a task advances it on the board automatically, so status at the engineering level is never a step removed from what's happening in the codebase.
A merged pull request closes its card without anyone updating a field, keeping the same fact visible at every layer of the organisation rather than reinterpreted at each one.
Cycle-time and burndown charts build themselves from commit and merge activity, giving a department head the same accurate picture an individual engineer already sees.
Delivery forecasts recalculate from the team's own pace as sprints close, so a date drifting off track surfaces weeks before the deadline instead of the week of the board meeting.
A command center answers "where are we?" across every team from the same underlying merge data, without a status deck someone assembles by hand for the review.
A sprint review that agrees with the board meeting above it
A corporate structure means more people whose job is to know status without doing the work themselves: a programme lead, a department head, someone reporting to a board that meets on a fixed schedule regardless of whether the sprint is ready to be reported on. When burndown and cycle-time come straight from merge history, the engineer's sprint review and the department head's quarterly summary are built from the same source, not two separately compiled versions that happen to disagree.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits, so a team that's quietly taken on more than it can finish shows that constraint on the board itself rather than in a status report someone has to write around it. That matters more as an organisation grows, because requests start arriving from more directions at once, and a shared triage inbox keeps them visible instead of scattered across separate department inboxes.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India, and billed per seat in rupees. There's no Spanish or EU entity behind it, worth knowing before a procurement conversation gets underway. Every ShipSprint workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, and every administrative action is written to an audit log.
Questions from Madrid dev teams
The same underlying numbers. Because burndown and cycle-time are built from real merge history rather than manually compiled reports, the owner command center and an individual engineer's board draw from the same source, not from separately assembled summaries that can quietly disagree.
No. ShipSprint is built and operated by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India, and billing runs per seat in rupees with annual billing available. Prices exclude any local taxes that apply to your purchase.
Yes. Engineering, HR, marketing and operations each get templates and vocabulary suited to their work, on one subscription and one company-wide view, rather than needing separate tools stitched together after the fact.
Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards, SSO and the owner command center. See the pricing page for full detail.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required