Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in San Francisco
San Francisco invented the sprint board and priced it for a Series C budget. ShipSprint builds the board off the commit, at a price a six-person team can actually justify.
The category was born here, and so was the workaround
Most of the tools that popularized the sprint board were designed in San Francisco, and the habit they encouraged along the way was just as influential as the board itself: an engineer drags a card when a task is done, a manager trusts the board, and everyone moves on. It's a clean idea that breaks the moment an engineer is heads-down on the next ticket and the card-dragging step quietly stops happening. Nobody's being careless, it's just that updating a field was never actually the job.
A team that's raised a small seed round and is watching runway closely feels that gap acutely, because there's no dedicated scrum master whose job is chasing card hygiene. A founder checking the board before an investor update gets a picture that's already a step behind the codebase, built from whoever remembered to click something rather than from what actually shipped.
ShipSprint fixes the gap at the source instead of asking a lean team to police it. A branch tied to a card moves it across the board automatically the moment it's opened, and a merged pull request closes the card without anyone touching a field. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that same merge history, so a founder checking status before a call is looking at what the repository actually did.
What actually changes on an engineering board
None of this needs a platform team to configure. It works the way GitHub already works.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances across the board automatically, with no manual step for a lean team to enforce.
A merged pull request closes its card, so a founder checking the board gets an honest picture without pulling anyone off actual work.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from actual merges, not from a chart somebody redraws before an investor update.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits, and new requests land in a triage inbox instead of a founder's already-full DMs.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace as sprints close, so a slipping date shows up weeks before the standup where someone has to say it out loud.
An investor update that doesn't need a rehearsal first
A demo day or investor update prepared off a manually updated board usually starts with a private correction, someone checks the actual repo, quietly adjusts what the board said, and presents the corrected version. That translation step disappears when the board already reads off merge activity. A founder pulling up the forecast a day before a check-in is looking at exactly what the team, and the repository, agree happened.
The same discipline extends to a distributed team, which describes most San Francisco engineering orgs stretching a seed round further by hiring outside the Bay Area. A card's position is the status regardless of time zone, and a built-in wiki keeps architecture decisions next to the work they affect, with page history, so a remote hire two weeks in isn't reconstructing context from a Slack scroll.
None of it depends on watching engineers more closely. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking anywhere in the product. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe. ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India. There's no San Francisco office and no local phone line, support runs the same way for every customer regardless of location.
Questions from San Francisco dev teams
It sits on top of your GitHub workflow, not in place of it. Branches move cards, merged pull requests close them, and burndown and cycle-time analytics are generated from that activity, so the board reflects what's actually in the repo.
It doesn't need to be. You're charged in rupees on a card or by invoice, same mechanics as any other SaaS billing relationship. The practical effect for a US buyer is price: it tends to land at a fraction of what per-seat US-market tools charge. See the pricing page for current numbers.
No, and it's not configurable into being one. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking. Just what merged and hours logged by the person who logged them, visible to that person and adjusted for leave.
Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 annually. Business is ₹599 per user per month and adds forecasts, scorecards, the owner command center, priority support and SSO. Both are on a 14-day full-access trial with a sample project preloaded, no card required. Details on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required