Project Management for Security Teams
A finding in a spreadsheet has no urgency. The same finding as a card in a column with a WIP limit, aging visibly, has exactly the urgency it should.
The gap between "logged" and "tracked"
Most security findings get logged the moment they're discovered and then stall the moment they're assigned. A spreadsheet row doesn't age visibly. A ticket in a general-purpose queue competes with everything else and usually loses, quietly, until an audit or a re-scan finds it again months later exactly where it was left.
What a finding actually needs once it's found is the same thing any other overdue work needs: a visible column, a clock, and enough friction that it can't be silently ignored. That's a project-management problem as much as a security one, and it's the part ShipSprint is actually built to solve.
To be direct about scope: ShipSprint has no vulnerability scanner, does not detect findings, and holds no compliance certification, no SOC 2, no ISO 27001. What it does is take a finding once you have it and make sure remediation doesn't disappear.
That's a narrower promise than a security platform makes, and it's deliberately narrower. The gap most teams actually have isn't finding vulnerabilities (scanners already do that); it's the tracking step in between discovery and fix, where a real deadline either exists or it doesn't.
A finding that's been "known for a while" usually isn't sitting in obscurity because nobody cares. It's sitting there because it never got a mechanism forcing anyone to look at it again. That's the specific gap a board with a WIP limit and a forecast closes, not by making the finding scarier, but by making it impossible to quietly ignore.
What this actually does for a security team
Built around getting findings closed, not around detecting them.
A finding on a board with a WIP limit ages visibly and competes for attention against everything else the team is doing, instead of sitting static in a spreadsheet where nothing forces a second look.
Each finding gets a real owner on a real board. Delivery forecasts, built from measured team velocity, will show if remediation work is falling behind pace, visible weeks before a deadline is missed rather than the day it is.
Every admin action inside ShipSprint is logged, and two-factor authentication is available to every user on the workspace: facts about the tool's own posture, not a claim about any certification.
When a finding needs an engineering team to actually fix it, the "I'm blocked" flag routes it to the right person with context attached, instead of a finding bouncing between teams over email with the details re-explained each time.
The wiki's page history means the reasoning behind a risk-accepted or deferred finding is retrievable later, genuinely useful the next time someone asks "why was this marked resolved" and the person who decided has moved on.
The whole workspace exports as JSON at any time, on any paid plan. Your own findings and remediation history are never locked in.
Said plainly, so there's no ambiguity
- No vulnerability scanning and no scanner integrations: findings come in from wherever your team already finds them, and get tracked from there
- No SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no HIPAA or PCI-DSS certification. ShipSprint holds none of these, and doesn't imply otherwise anywhere on this page
- No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking of the security team or anyone else
- Every workspace is an isolated tenant, and admin actions are logged: real, verifiable facts about the platform, stated as exactly that and nothing more
- No claim of penetration-test results, threat-model reviews, or any third-party security assessment beyond what's stated plainly above
A remediation cycle, walked through
A finding comes in from wherever your team sources it and becomes a card with an owner and a severity. It sits in a column with a WIP limit, so it can't just accumulate behind higher-visibility work indefinitely. As the team's sprint velocity is measured, the forecast shows whether remediation is on pace to close before the deadline that matters (an internal SLA, a customer commitment, a re-scan date), with enough lead time that "we're behind" is a conversation you have on your own terms, not one forced by the deadline itself.
Once it's closed, the wiki page documenting the decision (fixed, risk-accepted, deferred) stays put with its history, so the next person asking "why is this marked resolved" gets an actual answer.
Why the tool's own posture matters here, honestly stated
A security team evaluating any new system asks reasonable questions about it before adopting it: who can access what, whether actions are logged, whether the data can be gotten back out. Those questions apply to ShipSprint the same as any other vendor, and the honest answer is a list of specific facts rather than a badge: every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, every admin action is logged, and the whole workspace exports as JSON at any time on any paid plan.
That's a real, checkable list, not a substitute for a certification, and not presented as one. If your procurement process requires SOC 2 or ISO 27001 as a hard gate, ShipSprint won't clear it today, and it's better to know that before a trial than after one.
Where it tends to fit instead is as the internal system of record sitting behind whatever certified tooling handles the parts that genuinely require certification: the place remediation actually gets tracked and closed, feeding an honest status upward, rather than the system of record itself for a compliance program.
Pricing
Findings tracking, the wiki and audit logging on admin actions are available from Team.
| Plan | Price | Relevant here |
|---|---|---|
| Team | ₹299/user/month or ₹2,899/year | Findings board, WIP limits, wiki with page history |
| Business | ₹599/user/month or ₹6,499/year | Adds remediation-pace forecasts and the command center |
Business adds forecasts on remediation pace and the owner command center if leadership wants a standing view of open findings. Every paid plan starts with a 14-day full-access Business trial, no card required: enough to run a real backlog of findings through it before committing.
Common questions
No. ShipSprint holds no compliance certifications: not SOC 2, not ISO 27001, not HIPAA or PCI-DSS. What it does offer are concrete, verifiable facts: isolated tenants per workspace, two-factor authentication available to every user, admin actions logged, and full workspace export as JSON at any time. See the security overview for detail.
No, there's no scanning capability and no integration with vulnerability scanners. Findings come in from wherever your team already sources them, and ShipSprint's job starts at tracking remediation from there.
Per-column WIP limits mean a remediation column can't quietly absorb an unbounded number of open items, and delivery forecasts built from real velocity flag if remediation is falling behind pace, weeks before a deadline, not on the day of it.
Yes. The entire workspace, including finding cards and wiki pages with their page history, exports as JSON at any time on any paid plan. There's no lock-in mechanism holding your remediation record hostage.
You can show the actual record: findings, owners, dates, and the wiki history behind decisions like risk-acceptance. What you can't do is present ShipSprint itself as a certified or compliant platform, because it holds no such certification. The record is real; the certification claim would not be.
Yes, every workspace is an isolated tenant. That's a structural fact about how the platform is built, separate from and not a substitute for any compliance certification, which ShipSprint does not hold.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required