Project Management Software for Cybersecurity

Remediation work runs on a different clock

Security work has a shape most project tools weren't built for. A vulnerability scan produces forty findings by breakfast. A pentest report lands with a remediation deadline attached to each item, not to the project as a whole. An incident opens, and every hour it stays open is itself the metric everyone's watching, not a side effect of it. Treating that like a normal backlog, one queue, one priority field, sorted by whoever shouts loudest, is how a critical finding sits next to a nice-to-have for three weeks because nobody separated them.

Most security teams solve this with a spreadsheet per engagement or per scan, which works until there are six of them open at once and someone needs to know, across all six, what's actually still exposed. By the time that question gets asked in a room with a client or an auditor in it, reconstructing the answer from six spreadsheets is its own project.

The pattern that actually causes damage isn't usually the finding nobody noticed, scanners are good at noticing. It's the finding everyone saw, assigned to someone, and then lost track of, because it sat in a general ticketing system built for feature requests and password resets, with no way to tell at a glance that it was three weeks overdue against its own severity-based deadline.

ShipSprint doesn't know what a CVE is and isn't pretending to be a vulnerability scanner. Findings and tickets still come from wherever they already come from. What it's built to do well is what happens after that: turning each finding into a task with an owner, a due date and a status that's visible without asking, on a board where a WIP limit stops "in remediation" from becoming a place things go to wait.

Forty findings by breakfast, one board by lunch

Picture the morning after a scan completes: forty findings, ranging from a genuinely exploitable misconfiguration to a low-severity note that could sit for a quarter without consequence. Dumped into one flat list, sorted by nothing in particular, the critical one is indistinguishable from the noise until someone reads all forty carefully, which is exactly the moment a busy team doesn't have.

Triaged through the inbox instead, each finding becomes its own task with its own owner and its own due date reflecting its actual severity, and the WIP limit on "in remediation" means the team can't quietly take on more critical fixes at once than it can realistically close. The critical misconfiguration and the low-severity note end up on the same board, but they don't get treated the same way, which is the entire point of triage, and the thing a flat list can't do on its own.

What we don't claim

Said plainly, because a security team is the audience least likely to accept it any other way: ShipSprint holds no SOC 2 report, no ISO 27001 certificate, and no other compliance attestation. If a vendor security review requires one as a condition of use, that's a real gate, and this page won't talk you around it. Better to know that before a team builds workflows around a tool that isn't going to clear it.

What's true and checkable is narrower: every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, every admin action is written to an audit log, and the whole workspace can be exported as JSON at any time. That's the complete list, not a preview of a bigger one still in progress.

What ShipSprint is for here is coordination: turning findings and incidents into tracked, owned, time-boxed work with a visible trail of who did what and when. It is not a vulnerability scanner, a SIEM, or a compliance management platform, and it isn't trying to compete with any of those, it's the board those tools' output lands on.

Where this fits

This is written for a security team or security-focused company managing findings, incidents and remediation as its core activity, an internal security function, an MSSP, or a firm running assessments for clients. It doesn't do the scanning, ticketing intake or compliance tracking those functions usually need dedicated tools for; it's the board that work lands on once it already exists as a finding or an incident.

An internal security team inside a larger technology company can run its remediation queue as its own board on the same subscription the rest of the company already uses, one place for engineering's sprints, product's roadmap and security's findings, rather than a separate purchase just for the team with the most urgent deadlines.

What it costs

• Free, forever, for up to 5 users and 2 projects, enough for a small security team to run one engagement's remediation queue before deciding.
• Team runs ₹299 per user monthly, or ₹2,899 yearly, for teams up to 40 users.
• Business, ₹599 per user monthly or ₹6,499 yearly, adds forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center across every engagement.
• Every paid plan opens with a 14-day full-access trial on Business, sample project preloaded, no card required.