Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Toronto
Bay Street risk systems and King West product teams both run sprints, and both quietly trust a burndown chart nobody's actually checked against the repo. ShipSprint checks it for them, automatically.
The PATH tunnels aren't the only thing moving out of sight
Toronto's financial district moves between buildings underground through the PATH network, out of sight, and a lot of engineering status moves the same way: through a hallway conversation or a side thread that never makes it into a system anyone else can see. A Bay Street risk-systems team and a King West product team both run sprint boards, and both run into the same quiet failure. An engineer finishes a task, moves to the next one, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority at the time.
A burndown chart built on that kind of lag tells a lead less than the raw commit history would, which is a strange gap for teams that otherwise care a great deal about precision, whether that's a bank's release windows or a startup's own delivery promise.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly. A branch tied to a card advances it automatically. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so the chart in a Monday review reflects what actually shipped, not what someone remembered to click between meetings.
Built around merge history, not memory
Mechanics that hold up whether the team answers to a change-control committee or a two-week sprint cadence.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so a card marked done means the code actually shipped.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build from actual merge history, so the board tracks the code rather than a status field.
Per-column WIP limits keep a board honest about how much is genuinely in flight, and a triage inbox catches new requests before they land in someone's messages.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace, so a date at risk surfaces weeks early rather than on the day it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews lose their first ten minutes to someone cross-checking the board against GitHub before the actual conversation can start. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that reconciliation step disappears entirely, whether the review is happening in a downtown tower or over video with someone working from Brampton or Vaughan.
A built-in wiki holds the reasoning a burndown chart can't show, why an architecture decision got made, why an approach was ruled out, with page history that survives past the person who wrote it. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is not a Toronto company. It's built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees rather than dollars, a plain fact about invoicing, not a claim about being local. Support runs out of India, several time zones removed from Eastern time, which is why the product leans on things that don't need someone awake in both places at once: a board that stays accurate on its own, and forecasts that recalculate without anyone asking.
Questions from Toronto dev teams
Yes. Linking a card to a branch and having it advance, then close on merge, works the same regardless of how formal the surrounding release process is. Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox for new requests add structure on top for a team that answers to a change-control committee, without slowing down a team that doesn't.
No, and that's a design decision rather than a setting you can change. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work that was actually delivered and hours the person logged themselves. Scorecards are visible to the person they describe and adjusted for approved leave.
Prices are set and charged in rupees; your card or bank converts to Canadian dollars at whatever rate applies that day, the same way any foreign-currency charge works. We won't quote you a fixed CAD figure since the rate moves, but at current rates a Business seat lands well under what most Canadian project tools charge per month.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, for up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards, the owner command center and SSO. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required