Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Prague
A Prague team delivering for a client in Berlin or London is only as credible as its burndown chart, and a chart nobody's checked against the repo doesn't survive that test. ShipSprint's boards get status from GitHub, not from a card someone forgot to move.
A client can't see the work, only the chart
Prague's engineering scene, clustered around Karlín and built on a reputation for solid work at a cost Western European clients found attractive, delivers a lot of its output for companies whose own office sits in another country entirely. When the person doing the work and the person paying for it are in different companies, the sprint board's usual quiet failure, a card sitting in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority, stops being an internal inconvenience and becomes the client's whole window into progress.
A studio that can flag a risk three weeks out looks like a team that's on top of the project. A studio that only notices on the day the deadline passes looks like the opposite, even if the underlying work was genuinely just as hard, and a burndown chart built on stale manual updates makes that second outcome far more likely.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so what a client sees is what actually happened, without a studio having to reconstruct it before the call.
Built around merge history, not memory
Numbers a delivery lead can hand to a client directly, without a reconciliation pass first.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card without manual updates, so a card marked done is traceable back to the code.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a real answer for a client on the other side of a delivery.
Sprint boards with WIP limits keep a client engagement's work planned against real capacity, visible without a status call.
Delivery forecasts calculate themselves from the team's own measured pace, so a slipping date surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A Prague team delivering for a client further west, or well past the Atlantic, rarely has full overlap in working hours, which means a sprint review that opens with someone reconciling the board against the repo eats into the small window where a live conversation is even possible. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step disappears, and a client stakeholder can read the card's column without a call.
A built-in wiki holds the technical decisions and client-specific quirks that would otherwise live only in one senior engineer's head, with page history, so a new team member picking up a client's codebase mid-engagement has somewhere real to look. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in India, with no Prague office or Czech entity. Billing is in rupees, worth checking against the exchange rate and confirming VAT treatment with your own accountant if you're invoicing clients in euros yourself.
Questions from Prague dev teams
It's built from actual merge history, so it's accurate without a reconciliation pass before a client sees it. A lead can point a client at the real chart rather than assembling a status update specially for the call.
Yes. Time logs roll up by project, so hours spent on one client's work don't blend into another's, and the totals are there when it's time to reconcile against what was actually billed.
No, and that's a design decision, not a setting someone can turn on. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking. Just delivered work and logged hours, adjusted for leave, visible to the person the scorecard describes at any time.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects. Team is ₹299 per user per month for up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 and adds forecasting, scorecards and the owner command center. Full breakdown on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required