Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Reading
Reading anchors the Thames Valley's enterprise software corridor along the M4, where a release date is often a commitment written into a contract. ShipSprint's boards build that commitment's evidence from GitHub, not a status field.
An enterprise release calendar deserves an honest burndown
Reading's enterprise software and telecoms teams answer to release cycles and SLA commitments that a startup rarely has to think about, which makes it stranger how ordinary the underlying sprint board tends to be. The same quiet failure shows up here as everywhere else: an engineer finishes a task, moves to the next one, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across wasn't the priority. A burndown chart built on that lag is a poor foundation for a release date a customer contract depends on.
That gap matters more in an enterprise context, since a slipping date here isn't just an internal miss, it can carry a support contract penalty attached. A board that only tells the truth when someone remembers to update it is a genuinely risky foundation for that kind of commitment.
ShipSprint ties board state to GitHub directly instead of asking engineers to double as status reporters. A branch tied to a card advances it automatically. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so the number behind a release date is one a delivery lead can actually stand behind in front of a customer.
Built around merge history, not memory
Mechanics that turn a burndown chart into something a customer-facing conversation can rely on.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so a card marked done matches what actually shipped in production.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a real number for a support-contract-backed release date.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox give support and maintenance work the same visible, capacity-aware treatment as new features.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace, so a date at risk surfaces weeks before a customer would notice.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews spend their opening minutes reconciling the board against the repo, time that's harder to justify when the same review feeds a customer-facing status update on the other side of a support contract. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that reconciliation step disappears, and the numbers going into the customer conversation are already correct.
A built-in wiki keeps architecture decisions and support-relevant context next to the work they affect, with page history, useful when a partner reseller or regional office asks "why was it built this way" months after the fact. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in India, and billed in rupees. That's a fact about where the company is based, not a claim of UK presence or local support hours.
Questions from Reading dev teams
The forecast is calculated from the team's own measured velocity as sprints close, not an estimate made at kickoff. A date drifting off track tends to surface weeks early, which is the difference between a proactive customer conversation and an apologetic one after a support contract deadline has already passed.
Business supports unlimited projects and includes single sign-on alongside forecasts and the owner command center, and Team supports up to 40 users. Engineering gets GitHub integration and cycle-time analytics built from real merge history at every tier.
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking. Only delivered work and self-logged hours. Scorecards are visible to the person they describe and adjusted for approved leave.
Free for up to five users and two projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, and adds forecasts, scorecards, SSO and the owner command center. Every paid plan starts with a 14-day full-access trial, no card required. Full pricing is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required