Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Quebec City
Québec's compact, francophone tech scene runs alongside government and insurance work where a decision made two years ago can resurface on the next contract. ShipSprint's boards get status from GitHub, needing no translation either way.
A card that moves itself needs no report in either language
Québec City's smaller, more compact engineering teams work mostly in French, with the government-adjacent and insurance-adjacent habits of the wider local economy, formal documentation, a preference for a record that holds up when someone asks about it later, rubbing off even on companies far too small to have a compliance department of their own. That preference rarely reaches the sprint board itself, which fails the same quiet way everywhere: an engineer finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority.
A burndown chart built on that lag is a poor foundation in a setting where the same handful of firms work with each other repeatedly across projects, and a decision or a delivery record made on one contract can easily resurface on the next.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, legible without a written status report in either official language.
Built around merge history, not memory
A record that holds up months later, without anyone having to write it up specially.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board on its own, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card automatically, so the board tracks the code rather than a status field.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a record that holds up whenever someone asks.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox keep new requests planned against real capacity, with a visible, exportable trail.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own completed sprints, so a date at risk surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo before the actual conversation can start, and that reconciliation is usually conducted in whichever language happens to come up first, which adds friction a smaller, mostly francophone team doesn't need. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step disappears before the review even begins.
A built-in wiki keeps decisions next to the work they affect, with page history so an earlier version isn't simply overwritten and lost, and any sentence on a page can become a task without retyping it elsewhere. Status expressed through board position and column doesn't need translating in either direction, a small thing that saves real friction in a workplace running mostly, but not entirely, in French.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, a fact about invoicing, not a claim to any presence in Quebec. ShipSprint holds no Quebec or Canadian government certification, and support runs out of India rather than the province, worth being direct about for a team with formal public-sector procurement requirements.
Questions from Québec City dev teams
The product interface itself is in English. What works regardless of the working language is the board: status shows through column and position, driven by GitHub activity, rather than through written updates that need translating.
No, by design. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work outcomes and hours logged by the person who worked them, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Prices are set and charged in rupees, and your card converts to Canadian dollars at the rate that applies on the day. At current rates a seat lands well below most Canadian project tools.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required