Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Bengaluru
Whitefield and Outer Ring Road run on sprint cadences that most boards only pretend to track. ShipSprint builds the board from the commits, not the standup.
A sprint board that trusts the commit, not the standup
Along Outer Ring Road and out toward Whitefield, a Bengaluru engineering floor runs on the same rhythm most tech-hub cities recognize: two-week sprints, a backlog groomed on a Monday, a burndown chart somebody's supposed to be watching. What's less recognized is how often that chart is quietly wrong, because it depends on an engineer remembering to drag a card at the exact moment they finish the thing the card describes, in the middle of debugging something else entirely.
Nobody's being careless. A developer three hours into a merge conflict isn't thinking about board hygiene, and a card sitting in "In Progress" long after the branch actually merged isn't a signal of anything except that updating the board lost out to shipping the code. The result is a burndown chart built on the last time someone remembered to click something, not on what actually got delivered, and a sprint review that opens with someone quietly checking GitHub before saying anything out loud.
ShipSprint's answer isn't a stricter reminder policy, it's removing the manual step. A branch tied to a card moves it across the board on its own, and a merged pull request closes it. The burndown chart and cycle-time numbers a Bengaluru engineering manager pulls up on a Wednesday are built from that same merge history, not from whoever happened to update a field before leaving for the day.
What actually changes on an engineering board
None of this asks a Bengaluru dev team to add a status ritual on top of the one it already has, which is writing code.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances across the board automatically, no engineer has to remember to update anything mid-sprint.
A merge closes the card it belongs to, so "done" on the board means done in the repository, not done in someone's head three days ago.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are generated from actual merges, not from a chart someone redraws by hand before a Friday sync.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits and new requests land in a triage inbox instead of someone's messages, so a sprint gets planned against real capacity.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace as sprints close, so a date drifting off track shows up weeks early, not the morning it's due.
A sprint review that starts with a number, not a scramble
A Friday sprint review on a Bengaluru engineering floor usually opens the same way: someone pulls up the board, notices half of it doesn't match what actually shipped, and spends the first five minutes of the meeting reconciling reality against a chart nobody trusted going in. That reconciliation is the real cost of a manually updated board, not the missed cards themselves but the time everyone spends silently correcting for them before the actual conversation can start.
When the board updates itself off GitHub activity, that opening five minutes disappears. A manager pulling up the burndown chart on a Wednesday morning is looking at what merged, not at what somebody remembered to mark done before a meeting. That matters more the bigger the team gets, because the gap between "what the board says" and "what the repo says" grows with every extra engineer who's too deep in a problem to think about card hygiene.
None of it comes at the cost of visibility elsewhere. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking anywhere in the product. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe, built from what got delivered and the hours logged, not from a manager watching a feed. That distinction matters on a floor where the whole point of automating the board is to stop chasing status, not to start monitoring people instead.
Questions from Bengaluru dev teams
It sits on top. Engineering still lives in GitHub, branches and pull requests work exactly as they do today. ShipSprint reads that activity to move cards and generate burndown and cycle-time analytics, so the board reflects the repo instead of trailing behind it.
Yes. Billing runs in rupees with GST-compliant invoices, and annual billing is available. Prices exclude applicable taxes.
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking, only work outcomes: what merged and the hours the person logged themselves. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe.
Free covers up to five users and two projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required