Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Geneva
A Geneva technical team often reports to a secretariat, a funding partner and an implementing organization at once, and none of them share an email domain. ShipSprint's boards answer "where are we" from GitHub, not from someone remembering to update a card.
A coalition of organizations needs one honest board, not four status decks
A Geneva technical or programme team is frequently a temporary coalition, a secretariat, a funding partner and an implementing organization, each reporting to a different line and a different set of internal rules. That structure makes a burndown chart's accuracy matter more than usual, since there's rarely one manager who can walk the floor and informally confirm what actually happened. The usual sprint-board failure still applies: an engineer or technical lead finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority.
A grant cycle or a donor deadline doesn't move because internal tracking ran behind, and the consequence of missing one can affect the next round of funding entirely, which makes a burndown chart nobody's checked against real progress a genuine risk, not just an inconvenience.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly where code is involved. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, giving every organization in a coalition the same honest picture without waiting for someone to compile a summary.
Built around merge history, not memory
A record that leaves a real trail when a coalition project has to hand its full history to a lead agency or a funder at close.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required from a technical team already coordinating across organizations.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so a partner organization sees exactly what shipped, not what someone remembered.
Burndown and cycle-time tracking build from actual merge history, useful when a coalition project's record has to be handed off intact.
Boards with clear ownership per card and a triage inbox catch incoming requests instead of losing them in someone's personal messages.
Delivery forecasts calculate themselves from the team's own measured velocity, so a date drifting out of reach becomes visible weeks in advance.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A coordination meeting that opens with someone reconciling the board against the actual work is a bad use of time when the room already includes people from several organizations who each answer to a different reporting line. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly where code is involved, that reconciliation step disappears, and a plain-language question like "what's still outstanding before the funder report is due" gets answered directly.
The wiki's page history matters more here than it might for a single company, since a coalition project often has to hand its full record to a lead agency or a funder at close, and reconstructing "who decided what, and when" from scattered inboxes across three organizations after key people have moved on is close to impossible. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in India, with no Geneva office and no Swiss entity. Billing is in rupees; if your organization needs a specific invoicing format for donor compliance, check the sample invoice against your requirements before committing.
Questions from Geneva dev teams
Yes, guests and partner-org users can be added to a workspace directly. Every workspace is its own isolated tenant, so access is a deliberate decision, added and removed as the project needs it, not an all-or-nothing company-wide account.
Yes. The workspace, including boards, burndown built from real merge history, the wiki with its page history, and time logs, exports as JSON at any point, which covers most handoff and archival requirements at the end of a project.
No. Quantuva Technologies is based in India, with no Swiss entity or local office. Support is handled remotely by email and in-app chat rather than through a local team.
No, pricing is the same everywhere: Free for up to 5 users, ₹299 per user per month on Team, ₹599 on Business. There's no separate NGO or nonprofit rate at this time. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required