Project Management Software for FinTech

Fast, next to a question you can't skip

A fintech team ships the way any product team ships: sprints, a backlog, a release cadence. What's different is that a fair share of tickets carry an invisible extra step. Someone in risk or compliance needs to look at the interest calculation change, the KYC vendor swap, the new limit on a lending product, before it goes out. That review doesn't show up on most boards. It happens in a side thread, gets forgotten, or becomes the thing that blocks a release nobody flagged as blocked.

ShipSprint doesn't pretend that review away, and it doesn't pretend to clear it for you either. What it does is make the review a visible step on the board, its own column, its own WIP limit, and keep a record of what was decided and why, next to the ticket, so six months later "why does it work like this" has an answer that isn't someone's memory.

A limit increase, worked through three sign-offs

Say product wants to raise a lending limit for a segment of returning customers. Engineering can build it inside a sprint. But it also needs a risk team's sign-off on the new threshold, a compliance read on the disclosure language, and a product decision on rollout percentage, three approvals from three people who don't sit in the engineering stand-up. Left informal, this becomes a chain of messages nobody can reconstruct later, and the feature either ships with one sign-off never properly closed out, or sits half-finished for weeks because nobody owns chasing three different people.

On ShipSprint, each sign-off is its own task in its own column, assigned to the person who owns it, with a WIP limit that makes a backlog of eight pending approvals visible instead of invisible. The wiki page attached to the feature holds each decision as it lands: the threshold that was approved, the wording that was signed off, the rollout percentage that was agreed, so when someone asks eight months later why the limit is what it is, the answer is a link, not a reconstruction exercise. That's really the whole trade this page is making: a review that used to live in three people's memory now lives on the ticket, and it stays there after all three of them have moved to other things.

What a stalled review actually costs

A feature waiting on sign-off for an extra week rarely feels expensive in the moment, it's just "still with risk." But five features a quarter losing a week each to an unowned review queue is five weeks of engineering capacity sitting idle, waiting on a step nobody was tracking. Business, at ₹599 per user monthly, costs a fraction of what a single engineer's idle week is worth. Making the review step visible tends to close that gap faster than adding headcount does.

What we don't claim, stated plainly

ShipSprint holds no PCI-DSS certification, no SOC 2 report, no ISO 27001 certificate, and no RBI-specific certification. If a vendor security questionnaire or a regulator's checklist requires one of those, that's a real gate, and this page isn't going to talk around it. Check before you build a workflow around the tool, not after.

What's real and checkable, stated exactly and not softened from something larger: every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, every admin action is written to an audit log, and the whole workspace exports as JSON at any time. That's the complete list. ShipSprint is a project and engineering tracker: it does not process payments, hold cardholder data, or touch customer account balances, so it sits outside the systems that typically carry the heaviest certification burden in the first place. Keep customer financial data in the systems built and audited for that job; use ShipSprint for the work of building and shipping the product around it.

Who this actually fits

This is written for the team building the financial product, a lending platform, a payments app, a wealth or insurance product, a neobank's own engineering and product org, where releases regularly need a risk or compliance read before they ship, even without a certification requirement attached. If a chunk of your tickets already have an informal extra approval step nobody's tracking, that's the exact gap this page is about.

It's a different fit for a traditional bank's internal IT department running back-office systems. That's a heavier, more procurement-driven world with its own requirements, and this page doesn't speak to it directly.

Starting with one review queue, not the whole company

The fastest way to see whether this actually helps is to put one recurring review process on a board, every feature that needs a risk sign-off, say, and track it for a month before deciding whether engineering, ops and HR move onto the same subscription too. Loading in whatever's already mid-review takes an afternoon, not a migration project.

The Free plan covers that scale on its own, for a team of five. Because every department sits on the same subscription once you decide to expand, adding a second team later is a template choice, not a new vendor to get past procurement.

One subscription, engineering to compliance ops

• Engineering, HR, marketing and operations each get their own templates and vocabulary on one subscription, a risk or ops team tracking vendor reviews doesn't need a separate tool from the engineers shipping the product.
• ShipSprint connects to Claude and ChatGPT, so someone can ask "what's still pending sign-off" in plain language instead of scrolling a board.
• Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user monthly (₹2,899 yearly) for up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user monthly (₹6,499 yearly) and adds forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center.
• Every paid plan opens with a 14-day full-access trial on Business, a sample project preloaded, no card required. Billing is per seat in rupees with GST-compliant invoices. Full breakdown at pricing.