Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in London
From fintech engineering floors in Canary Wharf to product teams around Shoreditch, London sprint boards run on trust more often than anyone admits. ShipSprint gets its status from what actually merged.
The board says one thing, the codebase says another
A London engineering team, whether it's a fintech squad in Canary Wharf or a product team above a coffee shop in Shoreditch, tends to run the same sprint ritual: cards on a board, a daily stand-up, a burndown chart somebody screenshots for the Friday update. The problem shows up quietly. An engineer finishes a task, gets pulled into the next one, and never drags the card across. By the time the sprint review happens, the board is a record of what people remembered to update, not what actually shipped.
That gap matters more than it looks. A burndown chart built on manually updated status is a chart of people's memory, and memory is worst exactly when a sprint is busiest. The two-week stretch where the board most needs to be accurate is the one where nobody has time to keep it accurate.
ShipSprint's engineering boards move with the code instead of around it. Open a branch tied to a card and the card advances on its own. Merge the pull request and the card closes. Burndown and cycle-time charts build themselves from that merge history, so the chart in Monday's review reflects what actually happened last week, not what someone remembered to click.
Built around merge history, not memory
Every mechanic here exists to remove the moment where someone has to remember to update a card.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board on its own, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card automatically, so "done" on the board means done in the codebase, not done in someone's head.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, so the chart reflects what shipped, not what got updated.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox mean new requests land somewhere visible instead of an engineer's messages, and work gets planned against real capacity.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own completed sprints, so a date at risk shows up weeks before it's due, not on the day it slips.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
The usual London sprint review opens with someone tabbing between the board and the repo, reconciling what the cards say against what actually merged, before the conversation about the work itself can even start. When the board updates itself from GitHub, that reconciliation step disappears. The burndown chart on the screen is already correct, because it was never manually assembled in the first place.
A built-in wiki sits next to the board for the decisions a burndown chart can't capture: why an approach got ruled out, why an architecture choice was made a particular way. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly, so a decision made in passing during a review doesn't need retyping into the tracker to become real work.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company based in India, and billed in rupees. That's a fact about how invoicing works, not a claim about a UK office or local presence, and it's worth knowing before the first invoice arrives rather than after.
Questions from London dev teams
Link a branch to a card, and the card moves to reflect that work is under way, no manual drag needed. When the pull request tied to that branch merges, the card closes on its own. Burndown and cycle-time charts are then calculated from that same merge history, so the numbers reflect what actually shipped rather than what someone remembered to update. See the product overview for the full mechanics.
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking. The board reflects merged code, and time logging is self-reported and takes about five seconds. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe, not hidden in a manager's view.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., an India-based company, and charges process in INR, converted by your card provider at their rate on the day, the same as any other overseas subscription. There's no VAT charged or handled on our end, so check with your accountant how that's treated for your business.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards, the owner command center and SSO. Every paid plan opens with a 14-day full-access trial on Business, no card required. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required