Best Microsoft Project Alternatives
Microsoft Project is built for formal, dependency-heavy portfolios. Plenty of teams need less than that. Here are real alternatives, from lighter Microsoft tools to dedicated delivery platforms.
- 14-day full-access trial
- No card required
- 7-day refund on paid plans
Why teams look for a Microsoft Project alternative
Microsoft Project earns its reputation as heavyweight, deliberately. Gantt charts with dependencies, lead and lag times, baselines, critical-path analysis and, at higher tiers, portfolio and resource management across an entire organization: that's real, specialized capability for formal program delivery. It's also more schedule than most teams actually need, and the licensing, learning curve and setup overhead that come with it are the main reasons teams go looking elsewhere. It's worth noting Microsoft is retiring Project Online, its browser-based enterprise edition, on September 30, 2026, which is prompting some organizations already on that edition to review their options regardless of their opinion of Project itself.
The alternatives below split into two groups: dedicated delivery tools that trade scheduling depth for sprint-based simplicity, and other tools that still offer Gantt-style planning with less enterprise overhead. Cost is a real factor too. Project's licensing, especially at the tiers that unlock portfolio and resource management, is priced for organizations that need that scale, and a smaller team paying for it often isn't using most of what it offers.
Alternatives worth evaluating
Each one gives up some of Project's scheduling depth for something else.
Built for teams that don't need a formal schedule but do need a real delivery process: WIP-limited boards, a triage inbox, five-second time logging, and forecasts calculated from measured velocity instead of a plotted timeline. One subscription covers Engineering, HR, Marketing and Operations. Best fit for a team whose actual planning happens in sprints, not a Gantt chart.
A spreadsheet-style work management tool with genuine Gantt charts, dependencies and resource views, closer to Project in capability than most alternatives on this list, but with a more approachable, collaborative interface. Best fit for a PMO or operations team that still needs formal scheduling but wants less friction than Project's desktop-first tooling.
Microsoft's own lighter option, free and bundled with Microsoft 365 at the Basic tier, with a paid Premium tier adding timeline and dependency views without Project's full portfolio machinery. Best fit for a team that wants to stay inside the Microsoft ecosystem but genuinely doesn't need enterprise-grade scheduling.
A project-oriented tool with timelines, dependencies and portfolio visibility, aimed at teams that want structure and cross-project reporting without a dedicated PMO tool. Best fit for a team that wants some of Project's planning discipline in a more modern, less technical interface.
An open-source project management tool with Gantt charts, agile boards and portfolio features, self-hostable for organizations that need full control over data and deployment. Best fit for security-conscious organizations, public-sector teams, or industries like construction that need Project-style scheduling without the licensing cost or cloud dependency.
How to actually choose
The honest first question is whether you actually need a formal, dependency-aware schedule, one where slipping one task visibly cascades into others and the plan itself has to be maintained as reality changes. If yes, Smartsheet or OpenProject keep that capability with less overhead than Project, and Microsoft Planner Premium is worth checking if staying inside Microsoft 365 licensing matters. If the honest answer is that your team plans in sprints and just wants to know when work will actually land based on how fast it's actually moving, that's a different problem, and it's the one ShipSprint or Asana are built to solve. Teams that keep Project out of habit, because it's what the organization has always used, are often the ones who find a lighter tool covers what they actually do day to day.
It's worth trialing before committing either way. A schedule built in Project represents real invested effort, dependencies mapped, baselines set, and abandoning that isn't free. Running a sprint or two on a lighter tool alongside the existing schedule, rather than switching outright, is usually the safer way to find out whether the team actually needs what Project provides or has just been maintaining a plan nobody consults day to day.
Common questions
Smartsheet and OpenProject both offer genuine Gantt charts with dependencies, closer to what Project does than a kanban board. Microsoft Planner Premium adds a timeline view too. ShipSprint and Asana take a different approach entirely, sprint- and task-based delivery rather than a plotted schedule.
Microsoft has announced Project Online, the browser-based enterprise edition, is being retired on September 30, 2026. Organizations on that edition specifically need a migration plan regardless of which alternative they choose; it's worth confirming Microsoft's current guidance directly if this applies to you.
Mainly when the team's actual planning rhythm is sprints rather than a fixed schedule. WIP limits, a triage inbox, time logging and velocity-based forecasting come built in, with far less setup than building and maintaining a dependency-aware schedule, at the cost of not having Project's formal scheduling depth.
Yes, Project supports exporting to formats like Excel and standard project-interchange formats. Whether that data maps cleanly to a new tool depends heavily on how much of it is dependency and baseline data, which board-based tools generally don't have an equivalent for, so recreating active work is usually more practical than a full import.
Project's licensing runs directionally from about $10 to $55 per user per month in dollars depending on tier. ShipSprint's Free plan covers up to 5 users and 2 projects forever; Team is ₹299 per user per month (₹2,899 per year); Business is ₹599 per user per month (₹6,499 per year). They're different scopes of tool, so the real comparison is whether you need Project's scheduling depth at all. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Keep reading
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
- 14-day full-access trial
- Sample project included
- No card required
- 7-day refund on paid plans
Try ShipSprint free for 14 days. No card required.
Start free trial