Project Management Software
Most project management software serves one department and taxes everyone else. ShipSprint gives every team a board that fits how they actually work, then quietly handles the follow-ups and time logging that eat everyone's week.
What project management software should actually do
Every growing company reaches the same point. Work is happening, but nobody can answer simple questions without a meeting: what is everyone on this week, which project is going to slip, how many hours went into that client, why did this task sit untouched for nine days.
Most tools answer that by asking people to do more admin. Someone updates a status field, someone else chases the people who didn't, and a manager assembles it into a slide. The tool creates the very work it promised to remove.
ShipSprint takes the opposite position: the system should collect what it needs on its own, and the people doing the work should get something back from it. Boards match how each team actually thinks. Logging a day's hours takes five seconds. Follow-ups happen without a human doing the chasing. And the forecast of when a project lands is calculated from the team's real delivery pace, not from someone's optimism.
One subscription, every department
The usual pattern is that engineering buys one tool, HR buys another, marketing buys a third, and finance pays for all of them in dollars. Nothing connects, and the person signing the cheques still has no single view of the company.
ShipSprint ships templates for each team, so everyone works in their own vocabulary on the same underlying system:
- Engineering: sprints, story points, releases, burndown and cycle-time analytics, with GitHub branches moving cards and merged pull requests closing them
- HR: candidate pipelines, onboarding checklists and policy pages that live next to the work
- Marketing: campaigns, content calendars and launch checklists
- Operations: recurring processes, vendor tasks and request queues
Same product, same billing, same reporting. A department doesn't need its own purchase order to get a board that fits it.
The parts that remove work rather than add it
Each of these exists because it takes a recurring job off somebody's plate.
New requests land in a triage inbox instead of someone's DMs. Work gets planned into sprints against real capacity, with per-column WIP limits so a board cannot quietly fill up. It rolls into a roadmap you can show a client without rebuilding it in a slide.
The reason timesheets fail is that they take twenty minutes on a Friday. ShipSprint puts logging next to the task, takes seconds, and sends a friendly reminder when a day is missing, so hours arrive without anyone chasing them, and work you can bill stops disappearing.
Every person opens to today's items, a one-tap time log, and nothing else shouting at them. One tap on “I'm blocked” brings the right person in with the full context attached, rather than a message that says “quick question?”.
As sprints complete, ShipSprint learns how fast the team actually moves and projects completion dates from that. You find out a project is slipping weeks early, while there is still time to move scope or people, not on the day it was due.
Decisions live next to the work they affect, with page history so you can see what changed. Any sentence on a page can become a task, which is usually where documentation and delivery quietly drift apart.
One screen that answers “where are we?” across every team, plus a weekly digest that lands on Monday morning. Manager analytics and leave-adjusted scorecards mean credit is based on delivered work, not on who spoke loudest in the review.
Visibility without surveillance
This deserves stating plainly, because “visibility” is often a euphemism. ShipSprint takes no screenshots, logs no keystrokes and tracks no activity. There is no idle timer and no productivity score derived from mouse movement.
What it measures is work outcomes: items delivered, hours logged by the person who logged them, and where a task is stuck. Every individual can see their own scorecard whenever they want, so nothing in a review is a surprise. Scorecards are adjusted for leave, because penalising someone for approved time off is how a system loses the trust of the people feeding it.
This matters commercially, not just ethically. A tool the team resents gets filled in badly, and bad data produces confident, wrong forecasts. Teams that switch to ShipSprint tend to notice the actual shift isn't a new feature at all: it's that people stop performing busyness for a tool and just log what they did.
It works inside Claude and ChatGPT
ShipSprint connects to Claude and ChatGPT, so you can ask questions of your workspace in plain language (what slipped this week, who is over capacity, what is blocking the launch) and create or update work from the same conversation. For teams already working in an AI assistant all day, it removes the context switch entirely.
Pricing that assumes you are not a US enterprise
ShipSprint is billed per seat in rupees, with GST-compliant invoices and annual billing available. There are no per-module upsells and no mandatory call with a sales team.
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Free | ₹0, up to 5 users, 2 projects | Trying the core boards with a small team, free forever |
| Team | ₹299 / user / month, or ₹2,899 / user / year | Growing teams up to 40 people who need every project in one place |
| Business | ₹599 / user / month, or ₹6,499 / user / year | Owners who want forecasts, scorecards and the full command center |
Every paid plan starts with a 14-day full-access trial on the Business plan, with a sample project already loaded and no card required. Prices exclude applicable taxes.
Is the chaos actually costing you anything?
It's worth doing the math rather than taking anyone's word for it. Take the hours each person loses per week to status meetings, "any update?" pings and chasing timesheets, and price them at what those hours cost:
people × hours lost per week × 4.33 weeks × (monthly salary ÷ 173 working hours)
For a fifteen-person team on an average salary of ₹60,000, losing four hours each per week, that's roughly ₹90,000 a month, against ₹8,985 for the same fifteen people on Business. You don't have to recover all of it for the maths to work; recovering a third pays for the tool several times over. The savings calculator on the home page runs the same formula on your own numbers.
Common questions
No. Most teams start with one department, usually the one with the most visible delivery pressure, and add others once the first board is running. Because every team sits in the same subscription, adding the second one is a template choice, not a new purchase.
They do when it takes five seconds and sits next to the task they just finished, rather than in a separate timesheet app on a Friday afternoon. Missing days trigger a reminder to the person, not a report to their manager.
They improve as sprints complete, because they are derived from your team's measured throughput rather than from estimates. Early on, treat them as a direction of travel; after a few sprints they become the earliest warning you have that a date is at risk.
No. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work outcomes such as delivered items and logged hours. Individuals can always see their own scorecard.
You can export your whole workspace as JSON at any time, on any paid plan. Workspaces are isolated per tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, and every admin action is recorded in an audit log. The security overview covers this in detail.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required