Task Management Software
Everyone in the company has a task list. The problem is that they're in four different tools, and nobody outside engineering was invited to the good one.
The task list problem isn't engineering's alone
Engineering usually gets proper task management: a board, sprints, a backlog someone grooms. Everyone else gets what's left over: a checklist in a shared doc for onboarding, a spreadsheet for the marketing calendar, a running thread of "can someone also" requests for operations. Each works passably in isolation and produces nothing anyone else in the company can see.
The cost shows up sideways. A new hire's onboarding tasks live in a doc HR maintains by hand. A campaign launch depends on three teams whose task lists don't talk to each other, so the coordination happens in a meeting instead of on a board. Nobody who isn't the specific owner of a list can tell what's actually on it.
It also shows up as a specific kind of task that falls through: the recurring one. A vendor contract that needs renewing every quarter, a compliance check that runs monthly, a report someone owes on the first of every month, these don't fit neatly into a sprint board or a one-off checklist, so they live in someone's calendar reminders until that person is on leave and the task simply doesn't happen. Run through ShipSprint, that same renewal becomes a recurring task with an actual owner, not a promise someone made to themselves back in March.
ShipSprint runs one task engine underneath all of it, with each department working in its own vocabulary on top.
One system, every department's tasks
Same task engine under a sprint board, an onboarding checklist and a campaign calendar.
Everyone (regardless of department) opens to a "my day" screen: today's items and a one-tap time log. A support lead's tasks and an engineer's tasks look different, but they live in the same place and work the same way.
One tap on "I'm blocked" pulls in the right person with the context already attached, instead of a message that reads "quick question?" and sits unanswered while a task waits.
Engineering gets sprints and story points, HR gets onboarding checklists, marketing gets campaign and content calendars, and operations gets recurring process tasks and request queues, all on the same underlying system, just different vocabulary.
New requests land in a triage inbox instead of someone's messages, and boards carry per-column WIP limits, so a person's task list reflects what they can actually get to.
Any sentence in the built-in wiki can become a task, so a decision written down during a meeting doesn't need to be separately re-typed into someone's list afterward.
Logging a day's hours takes about five seconds and sits next to the task just finished, so task effort is captured as a habit rather than reconstructed from memory at month-end.
Accountability that doesn't require watching anyone
Task management often slides into a proxy argument about who's doing their job. ShipSprint takes no screenshots, logs no keystrokes and tracks no activity. Accountability comes from tasks completed and hours logged by the person who logged them, not from evidence of being at a desk.
Every person can see their own scorecard, and it's adjusted for leave, so a week of approved time off doesn't read as a dip in output. A missing day's hours prompts a reminder to the individual, not a note to their manager. The system chases the gap so a manager doesn't have to.
That distinction matters more once tasks span departments that don't share a manager. A marketing task assigned to someone in operations doesn't need a marketing manager peering over an ops person's shoulder to confirm it's happening. The task's own status, and the hours logged against it, are the record, visible to the person who did the work as much as to anyone assigning it.
A record of who did what, without a manager asking
Every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, and every admin action is written to an audit log, which for task management means there's an actual record of who reassigned a task, changed a deadline, or closed something out, rather than a claim someone has to take on faith weeks later.
The whole workspace exports as JSON at any time, so a department's task history (everything HR ran through onboarding this year, every recurring process operations owns) isn't stuck inside a tool nobody outside that department ever opens.
Tasks from a conversation, not a form
ShipSprint connects to Claude and ChatGPT, so tasks can be created and updated in plain language: "add a task for the vendor contract renewal, due next Friday, assign to Priya", rather than through a multi-field form built for people who create tasks all day.
That matters most for the departments that don't live in a task tool by default. An HR or ops person who'd never open a sprint board will use a task manager that meets them in a conversation.
The same applies in reverse. A manager checking in at the end of the week can ask "what did the onboarding checklist for this month's hires still need" instead of opening four different task lists to piece the answer together themselves.
What it costs to give everyone a task list
One subscription covers every department's tasks. There's no per-team add-on.
- Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently, enough for a small team to run one department's tasks properly.
- Team is ₹299/user/month (₹2,899/year), up to 40 users, with every department's templates included.
- Business is ₹599/user/month (₹6,499/year) and adds forecasts, scorecards, the owner command center and unlimited projects.
- Every paid plan starts with a 14-day full-access trial on Business, with a sample project preloaded and no card required.
Full breakdown on pricing.
Common questions
Each department gets its own template and vocabulary (onboarding checklists for HR, campaign calendars for marketing, sprints only where a team actually runs sprints) on the same underlying system.
Tasks can be created and updated in plain language through Claude or ChatGPT, and the "my day" screen is the same one-tap interface regardless of department, so there isn't a separate learning curve per team.
There's no screenshot, keystroke or activity tracking behind it. Logging takes about five seconds, and each person's own scorecard is visible to them, adjusted for leave.
Tapping "I'm blocked" pulls in the right person with the task's context already attached, so picking it up doesn't require reconstructing what's been done from a chat history.
Operations gets recurring process tasks and request queues as part of its own template, so a task that needs to happen every month doesn't rely on someone's personal calendar reminder to survive them being on leave.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required