ShipSprint vs Teamwork
Teamwork.com is built for agencies that bill clients directly. ShipSprint is built for a company running its own internal departments on one subscription, a different job even where the two tools look similar.
Choose ShipSprint if
You're running internal work across engineering, HR, marketing and operations, and you don't need client-facing invoicing built into the project tool itself.
Choose Teamwork.com if
You're an agency or professional-services firm that bills clients for time, and you want profitability tracking and invoicing in the same place as the project work.
The honest overlap
Both log time close to the work rather than as an afterthought, and both offer a genuinely usable free tier to start on.
What Teamwork.com actually is
Teamwork.com is project management software purpose-built for client services, agencies and professional-services teams that bill for their work. It's been around since 2007 and has earned a reputation as something close to a default choice for agencies specifically, sometimes described as the "agency partner" of the category. Native time tracking feeds directly into billing and invoicing, project profitability tracking shows what an engagement is actually costing against what's being billed, and features like granular client permissions, white-label options and unlimited free client users are built for a business whose customer is, literally, a client outside the company.
That client-facing focus is Teamwork's real differentiator. Most general project tools treat time tracking as a nice-to-have; Teamwork treats it as the thing the whole business runs on, because for an agency, unbilled or mis-tracked time is lost revenue, not just a reporting gap.
ShipSprint isn't built around that client-billing relationship at all. It's built for a company running its own internal work, engineering, HR, marketing and operations, on one subscription, with boards carrying WIP limits and a triage inbox catching new requests. Time logging exists, about five seconds per entry, next to the task just closed, but it feeds delivery forecasts and scorecards rather than client invoices. There's no invoicing or client-billing layer in ShipSprint at all.
So the honest framing isn't "which is the better project tool," it's "which relationship is the tool built around." Teamwork is built around the agency-to-client relationship. ShipSprint is built around a company's internal departments and how work moves between them.
Where the approaches diverge
Five real differences, centered on what each tool assumes about who's paying for the work.
Teamwork.com's time tracking feeds invoicing and profitability-per-client reporting directly. ShipSprint's time logging feeds delivery forecasts and scorecards; there's no client invoicing layer at all.
Teamwork.com offers unlimited free client users with granular external permissions, built for agencies collaborating with clients directly. ShipSprint's structure is internal, engineering, HR, marketing and operations, each with their own templates, not client-facing seats.
Teamwork.com offers white-label options so an agency can present the tool as its own to clients. ShipSprint doesn't offer white-labeling; it's used as ShipSprint, internally.
ShipSprint calculates delivery forecasts from a team's measured velocity as sprints complete. Teamwork.com's stronger reporting lens is profitability, what a project or client actually costs versus what's billed.
ShipSprint bills in rupees with GST-compliant invoices, from a company based in Hyderabad. Teamwork.com's published pricing is in dollars per user per month; check its current pricing page for the latest figures.
Where Teamwork.com is genuinely the better choice
If you run an agency or a professional-services business that bills clients for hours, Teamwork.com's whole design is built around a need ShipSprint doesn't address at all: turning logged time into an invoice and knowing whether a client engagement is actually profitable. Its client permissions, white-label option and unlimited free client seats are real, specific features for exactly that business model, built up over close to two decades of serving agencies. A creative or marketing agency evaluating tools shouldn't have to bolt a billing system onto a project tool that wasn't built for it, and Teamwork.com is a genuinely strong, purpose-built answer to that problem.
Common questions
No. ShipSprint doesn't have a client-billing or invoicing layer. Time logging feeds delivery forecasts and scorecards, not invoices. If client billing is central to your business, that's a genuine reason to look closely at Teamwork.com or another tool built for it.
ShipSprint's Free plan covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, forever; Team is ₹299 per user per month, Business is ₹599. Teamwork.com's published tiers run from a limited free plan through paid tiers priced in dollars per user per month; check Teamwork's current pricing page for exact figures, since rates and included seats shift.
It can work, but you'd be paying for a lot of client-facing machinery, permissions, white-labeling, invoicing, that an internal-only team won't use. That's a reasonable thing to weigh against a tool built specifically for internal departments.
You can recreate active work as cards on a board, but ShipSprint won't replicate client billing history or invoices, since it doesn't have that layer at all. Keep your Teamwork.com billing records in their own export rather than expecting them to carry over.
Yes, that's the core difference in scope. Engineering, HR, marketing and operations all run on the same ShipSprint subscription with their own templates, whereas Teamwork.com's design centers on the agency-to-client relationship rather than internal departments.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required