Employee Task Management Software
Most task management software is designed for the person assigning work. ShipSprint's starts from the screen the person doing it opens first.
Built for the person holding the task, not just the person who assigned it
A lot of "employee task management" software is really manager software with a task list bolted on, built to answer "what is everyone doing" for someone who isn't doing any of it. The employee's own experience is an afterthought: a crowded list, a dozen filters, no clear answer to "what do I actually do next."
ShipSprint starts from the other end. Every person, regardless of role, opens to the same kind of screen: today's items, nothing competing for attention, and a couple of one-tap actions for the two things that come up constantly, logging time and flagging a blocker. The manager's view exists too, but it's built on top of this one, not instead of it.
That ordering matters more than it sounds. A task tool people actually use daily produces real data. A task tool built purely for reporting upward gets updated right before the status meeting and ignored the rest of the week.
What an employee actually taps
A handful of small interactions, each one built to take seconds, not minutes.
Today's items, and only today's items, are what greets a person when they open ShipSprint, not a backlog of two hundred tickets they have to filter down themselves.
Logging a day's hours sits right next to the task just finished, not in a separate timesheet app opened once a week from memory. It takes about five seconds, which is short enough that people actually do it.
No drafting a message explaining the holdup. One tap pulls in the right person with the task's context already attached, so the block gets unstuck instead of sitting in a channel unseen.
Performance numbers are visible to the person they describe, and they're leave-adjusted, so a week off doesn't quietly count against someone the next time a manager looks.
Decisions live in a built-in wiki next to the work they affect. If a sentence on a page turns into an action item, it becomes a task without retyping it somewhere else.
A missing day of logged hours prompts the individual directly. It's a nudge, not an escalation, nobody's manager gets copied on a forgotten Tuesday.
A morning, start to finish
A support engineer opens ShipSprint and sees three items on today's screen: a bug fix already in progress, a customer follow-up, and a new request that just cleared triage. Nothing else. No scrolling through a shared backlog to figure out what's theirs today.
They finish the bug fix, log the ninety minutes it took right there on the card, five seconds, no separate app, and move to the follow-up. Halfway through, they're stuck waiting on a decision from someone else. One tap on "I'm blocked" pulls that person in with the card's context attached, instead of a Slack message that starts with "hey, quick question."
Later, a decision gets written into the team wiki explaining why a workaround was chosen over a proper fix. One sentence in that page becomes a task, a reminder to revisit it next quarter, without anyone retyping the reasoning into a separate ticket. The decision and the task that follows from it live on the same page, and neither goes looking for the other.
No screenshots, no keystrokes, no idle timer
The word "management" in employee task management software makes some people brace for surveillance: screen captures, activity percentages, a red flag when the mouse hasn't moved in ten minutes. ShipSprint takes none of that. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking of any kind.
What gets recorded is what the person themselves entered: hours against a task, a card moved to done, a blocker raised and cleared. That's a narrower dataset than an activity tracker collects, and it's also one an employee has no reason to resent, because it's the same data they'd want to see about their own week.
It's a practical choice as much as a principled one. Monitoring software gets gamed the moment people notice it, and the data quality collapses right when it matters most. Outcome data, entered by the person it's about, tends to stay honest for longer. It's also the thing employees mention most once they've used it a while: the scorecard describes what they shipped, not how long they looked busy doing it.
Where it sits inside the bigger board
None of this exists in isolation from the team's board. Requests still land through a triage inbox rather than straight into someone's task list, and columns still carry WIP limits, so an individual's "my day" screen never quietly fills past what's realistic for one person to handle in a sprint.
On Team plan and above, if the task is a piece of code, a branch moving or a pull request merging updates the card automatically, an engineer's task list reflects what they actually shipped, not what they remembered to update by hand at 6pm.
And because the workspace connects to Claude and ChatGPT, an employee can ask "what's still open on the Kavya migration" in plain language and get an answer pulled from their own tasks, without opening the board at all.
None of it depends on the team being technical. HR runs onboarding checklists through the same triage-and-my-day mechanics as engineering runs sprints; a recruiter's task list looks like recruiting work, built on the same underlying engine rather than a repurposed developer tool with the labels changed.
What it costs
- Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently, the my-day screen, time logging and the blocked flow are all included from day one.
- Team is ₹299 per user monthly or ₹2,899 yearly, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user monthly or ₹6,499 yearly and adds leave-adjusted scorecards and manager analytics.
- Every paid plan opens with a 14-day trial on full Business access, a sample project preloaded, no card needed. See pricing.
Common questions
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking. What's recorded is what the employee enters themselves, hours, task status, a blocker, the same information they'd want visible about their own week.
No, it's visible to the person it describes. It's also leave-adjusted, so time off doesn't show up as a dip in output the next time anyone looks at it.
About five seconds. The log sits next to the task that was just finished, rather than in a separate timesheet someone fills in from memory at the end of the week.
Yes. The built-in wiki keeps decisions next to the work they affect, with page history, and any sentence on a page can be turned into a task directly, useful for the action items buried inside meeting notes or a decisions log.
Yes. HR, marketing and operations run on their own templates and vocabulary on the same underlying system, so a marketing coordinator's "my day" looks like marketing work, not a repurposed engineering ticket queue. Which plan an employee's team is on determines which features they see. See pricing.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required