Project Management Software for Real Estate
This isn't property management software. It's for a developer's project office: coordinating architects, contractors, approvals and launch marketing across timelines that run for years, not a tenant's maintenance ticket.
What this is not, and what it actually is
"Real estate software" usually means one of two things: property management for an owner collecting rent and handling tenant maintenance requests, or a CRM for the sales team. ShipSprint is neither. It has no rent roll, no tenant portal, no maintenance ticketing, and it will not manage a leased unit for you. If your search brought you here looking for something to run a completed building's day-to-day operations, this is the wrong page. That's a mature, well-served category, and ShipSprint isn't trying to compete in it.
What it's built for is the project side of development: the coordination work between the day a site is acquired and the day it's handed over, which for most projects runs into years and involves architects, structural consultants, a dozen contractors, municipal approvals, and a sales and marketing team that needs to launch on schedule. That's a genuinely hard cross-functional coordination problem with a long timeline and a lot of parties who don't work for the same company, and it's usually run out of email threads and a shared drive because nobody built a tool that fits a developer's project office specifically.
It's a strange gap, because construction on the ground is often reasonably well managed with dedicated site tools, while the corporate coordination that decides whether the ground work can even start (the approvals, the consultant handoffs, the sales launch timing) gets almost none of that same rigour.
Why long timelines make this worse, not easier
A three-year development has a strange failure mode: nothing looks urgent on any given week, so small delays compound quietly for months before anyone notices the handover date has moved. An approval that sits for three weeks feels tolerable in isolation. Six of those in a row, across six different consultants, is a six-month slip that nobody flagged because no single delay looked like the problem.
The fix isn't more urgency. It's a system that shows the whole chain, so a stalled approval is visible against the handover date from day one, not discovered when marketing asks why the launch date moved again.
There's a second reason this matters specifically for real estate: staff turnover across a three-year project is close to guaranteed. The project manager who understood why a design changed in year one may not be there in year three to explain it. If that reasoning only ever lived in someone's head or a closed email thread, it leaves when they do.
What a developer's project office actually gets
Six things aimed at coordinating many parties over a long timeline.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits, and every incoming request lands in a triage inbox, so a municipal approval or a consultant's sign-off has a visible owner instead of ageing quietly in someone's inbox.
A built-in wiki with page history holds why a design changed or why a consultant was replaced, so the reasoning survives staff turnover across a project that outlasts most people's tenure on it.
Logging a day's time takes about five seconds and sits next to the task just finished, useful for tracking internal cost against a specific phase or block.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's measured pace as work completes, so a slipping chain of approvals shows up months early, while there's still time to act, not at the sales launch.
Everyone opens to a "my day" screen with today's items and one tap to say "I'm blocked," pulling in the right person with the context already attached: useful when the person who can actually unblock something is an external consultant, not a colleague down the hall.
The owner command center shows every project's status at once, with a Monday digest that lands without anyone assembling it from six different consultants' updates.
Who ends up owning this at a developer
Four kinds of person tend to open ShipSprint at a mid-size developer. The project manager is coordinating architects, structural consultants and a dozen contractors on one tower, and needs to know which approval is stuck this week, not last month. The sales and marketing lead is planning the launch campaign against a handover date that keeps depending on decisions made months earlier by people they've never spoken to. The compliance or legal lead is tracking approvals across multiple projects at different stages, each with its own set of authorities. And the finance lead is trying to understand what the project timeline actually looks like before committing the next tranche of capital.
None of the four wants a CAD tool or a site-management system, and this doesn't try to be either. What it gives them is a shared, honest picture of one thing they all secretly depend on and rarely see clearly: whether the chain of approvals and handoffs behind the project is actually moving, or just looks like it is.
Visibility for the project, not the person
There's no screenshot capture, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking. What's measured is delivered work (an approval closed, a milestone hit), not how someone spent their day.
Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe, so a project manager's review reflects the multi-year project's actual progress, not who sent the most status emails that week. That's especially relevant on a project long enough to outlast several performance cycles, where the temptation to measure activity instead of outcomes tends to creep in simply because the outcome, a finished building, is still years away.
Development, marketing and corporate work on one subscription
A developer's business usually runs project coordination, sales and marketing for the launch, and corporate functions like HR and finance, often on separate tools bought at separate times. ShipSprint gives each team its own templates and vocabulary on one subscription, so the fit-out schedule and the launch campaign can both reference the same handover date without living in different systems. When a developer runs several projects at once, each at a different stage, that's also what makes it possible to compare them fairly on one screen instead of trusting whoever shouts loudest in the weekly review.
Ask it directly
ShipSprint connects to Claude and ChatGPT, so a project lead can ask "which approvals are overdue" or "what's blocking phase two" and get an answer, or create the follow-up task, in plain language. On a project running for years, being able to ask a plain-language question about something decided eighteen months ago is worth more than it sounds. Most of that context has usually already left the building along with whoever knew it, which is really the point: the wiki and the forecast exist so a three-year project doesn't quietly depend on one person's memory.
What it costs
- Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, forever: enough to run one project's coordination and see whether it fits.
- Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, for up to 40 users, which covers most developers' project offices outright.
- Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds delivery forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center across every active project.
- Billing is per seat in rupees with GST-compliant invoices; every paid plan opens with a 14-day full-access trial on Business, sample project preloaded, no card needed.
The full plan comparison is on the pricing page.
Common questions
No. ShipSprint has no rent roll, no tenant portal and no maintenance ticketing. It runs the development-side project work (coordinating consultants, contractors, approvals and launch marketing), not the ongoing management of a completed asset.
Yes. The wiki's page history and the forecast built from measured pace are both meant for exactly this: keeping the reasoning behind decisions intact across staff changes, and surfacing a slipping chain of approvals months before a launch date, not weeks.
Every user on a workspace is a seat, so external collaborators can be added the same way internal staff are, on whichever plan you're on. There's no separate guest tier or feature restriction based on who they work for.
No. There's no screenshot capture, keystroke logging or activity tracking, only work outcomes such as completed tasks and logged hours. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe.
Yes, at any time, on any paid plan: the whole workspace, including the wiki's decision history, exports as JSON. Every workspace is an isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, and admin actions are logged; see the security overview for the rest.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required