Project Management Software for Universities
A university is dozens of departments that each work a different way, on projects that run for years, not terms. ShipSprint gives every faculty its own board and gives central administration one screen across all of them.
A university isn't one organisation, it's forty
A research group finishing a three-year grant, the registrar rolling out a new admissions system, a faculty renovating a lab wing: these projects share a university crest and almost nothing else. They run on different timelines, report to different people, and most have been managing themselves in whatever spreadsheet the last postdoc left behind.
Central administration's usual response is to ask every department for a quarterly update, which produces forty inconsistent documents that someone then has to reconcile by hand. It's a job nobody signed up for and nobody fully trusts once it's done, because half the numbers were guessed to hit the deadline.
ShipSprint doesn't ask departments to report the same way. It lets each one work in its own board and rolls the honest picture up automatically, which is closer to what project management for universities needs to be than a shared spreadsheet ever was.
What a department gets
Same underlying system, a different board for a lab, a faculty office and the registrar.
Each faculty or research group runs its own board and its own vocabulary, while central administration still sees a rolled-up view without asking anyone to change how they work.
A request for lab equipment, a facilities ticket or an ask of a shared research-computing team lands in a triage inbox instead of a coordinator's personal messages.
Per-column WIP limits stop a research team's board from quietly absorbing more concurrent work than the group's actual headcount supports.
Hours land next to the task in about five seconds, useful for reporting on funded research as well as tracking admin project effort, and a missing entry reminds the researcher, not the principal investigator.
Delivery forecasts are built from a team's measured pace as milestones close, so a grant deliverable at risk of slipping surfaces months early rather than at the review meeting.
The owner command center (here, the registrar's or provost's view) answers "where are we" across every department without collecting a single email.
Research projects and admin projects are not the same shape
A grant-funded research project runs for years, answers to a funder as much as to the university, and is led by a principal investigator who is not, and doesn't especially want to be, a project manager. An admissions rollout or a facilities upgrade runs on a fiscal year and answers to a director. Treating both the same way, one shared spreadsheet, one status format, flattens detail both sides need.
ShipSprint lets a research group and an administrative office each define their own stages, fields and cadence, while still surfacing into the same forecasting and command-center view for anyone who has to see across the whole institution. Neither side has to adopt the other's vocabulary to be counted in the same report.
What a grant deliverable actually looks like inside ShipSprint
A funded project logs its major deliverables as milestones at the start of the grant period, with the postdoc's board sized against their actual availability across teaching and research. A collaborator request from another department lands in triage instead of a string of forwarded emails, and a per-column WIP limit keeps the group from quietly running six workstreams on a team of three.
Eighteen months in, the forecast (built from the team's own measured pace rather than the proposal's original timeline) flags that a deliverable is trending six weeks late. That's early enough to renegotiate scope with the funder, rather than explaining a miss after the fact in the closeout report nobody wants to write.
What department-level chaos is quietly costing
A university running forty semi-autonomous projects, where each coordinator loses even two hours a week reconciling status for a central report, is losing well over three hundred hours a month across the institution. That's the equivalent of two full-time coordinators doing nothing but paperwork about work, rather than the work itself, month after month.
A Business subscription covering a mid-sized department costs a small fraction of that. The registrar's office doesn't need to eliminate every hour of reconciliation to make the switch worthwhile.
Departments that barely coordinate, on one subscription
A university's departments are often more autonomous from each other than the teams inside a single company: a chemistry lab and the finance office may never interact except through a shared calendar. Engineering, HR, marketing and operations-equivalent templates on one subscription mean each side gets the structure that fits it, and central administration isn't buying, renewing and reconciling a dozen separate tools.
ShipSprint also connects to Claude and ChatGPT, so a provost's office can ask which faculties have projects behind schedule this term without pulling forty people into a meeting to find out.
Sub-teams that outlast any single project
A department in a university is not a temporary project team assembled for one initiative. It's a standing group that will still exist long after this year's admissions rollout ships, running its own mix of teaching administration, research and service work indefinitely. That's a different shape from a school's staff room, where most projects share the same handful of people and the same academic year.
ShipSprint doesn't force a department to wind down its board when one project ends. A faculty's workspace persists as the projects inside it change, accumulating its own wiki, its own history and its own sense of pace, which is what makes the forecast for a new project more accurate the longer a department has been using it.
Academic freedom, not a dashboard of activity
Researchers and faculty are understandably resistant to anything resembling monitoring. ShipSprint takes no screenshots, logs no keystrokes and tracks no activity. It records delivered work and self-logged hours, nothing else. Every person's scorecard is visible to them and adjusted for leave, so a sabbatical or a fieldwork trip doesn't quietly dent a record nobody explained. That's a deliberate line, not an oversight: a system faculty don't trust simply won't get used honestly.
Starting with one lab, not the whole institution
A single research group or a single administrative office is enough to start: set up one board, load the projects already running, and let a few sprints pass before asking a second department to join. The Free plan covers that scale indefinitely, so there's no clock forcing a wider rollout before it's earned.
What tends to convince a second department isn't a pitch, it's seeing the first one's forecast catch a slipping deadline early enough to matter. Expanding after that is a subscription upgrade, not a fresh procurement cycle through central IT.
What it costs, department by department
- Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently: enough for one lab or one small office to try it before asking central IT to sign off.
- Team is ₹299 per user per month (₹2,899 a year), up to 40 users, which fits most single-department deployments.
- Business is ₹599 per user per month (₹6,499 a year) and adds forecasts, scorecards and the cross-department command center: what a registrar's office typically wants.
- Every paid plan starts with a 14-day full-access trial on Business, a sample project preloaded, no card required. Full detail at pricing.
Common questions
Yes. Each department keeps its own board, fields and vocabulary; the owner command center rolls the underlying data up without forcing a shared format on anyone.
There's no fixed project length. Sprints and forecasts adapt to a team's real cadence, whether that's a two-week admin sprint or a milestone-based research timeline spanning years.
No. ShipSprint doesn't integrate with LMS or SIS platforms. It's a project and work-management layer that sits alongside them, not a replacement for student records systems.
Every workspace is a fully isolated tenant, two-factor authentication is available to every user, admin actions are logged, and the whole workspace can be exported as JSON at any time. See the security overview.
Individual departments can start on their own Free or Team subscription, then move to a shared Business plan later without migrating data between systems. It's the same underlying product throughout.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects: enough for a small research group or a lean admin office, but most departments outgrow it quickly and move to Team, which covers up to 40 users on one subscription.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required