ShipSprint + Antigravity
A few lines in Antigravity's MCP config, and its agent can read your sprint board and act on it, the same sixteen tools Claude and ChatGPT get.
Real workspace access for an agentic IDE
ShipSprint speaks MCP, the open standard assistants and coding agents use to call real tools, and Antigravity connects to it the way it connects to any MCP server: through its own MCP config, using the connection details from your ShipSprint profile. Once it's added, an agent working a task inside Antigravity can check what a ticket actually asks for, log time against it, or leave a comment, without you switching to a browser to do any of it.
For an agentic workflow specifically, this matters more than it does for a simple autocomplete tool: an agent that's actually running a task end to end benefits from being able to close the loop itself, updating the ticket it was given rather than leaving that step for a human afterward.
Real tool calls, available to the agent
The same underlying tools the web assistants use, available to Antigravity's agent.
The agent pulls the real issue description and comment thread from the board before starting work, instead of working from a truncated prompt summary.
Calls log_work to record hours against the right ticket, and comment_on_issue to leave a note, both landing in the workspace and the audit log.
Calls create_issue when the agent surfaces a problem outside its current task's scope, so it's tracked rather than lost when the session ends.
Calls search_pages and read_page before proposing an approach that may already have been ruled out for a documented reason.
Setup, permissions, and what's logged
Add ShipSprint as an MCP server in Antigravity's config, using the connection details from your ShipSprint profile. Whatever account that connection is authenticated as, that's the exact set of permissions the agent operates under, nothing wider. Every action it takes, a logged hour, a comment, a new task, lands in the audit log exactly like any other, attributed to that account.
Full toolset: my_work, search, create_issue, update_issue, comment_on_issue, log_work, list_projects, list_issues, project_roadmap, whoami, list_spaces, list_pages, read_page, search_pages, create_page, update_page.
Where this genuinely isn't enough
This is a tool-access layer, not a supervision layer. Giving an agent write access to tickets and the wiki means its actions land for real, so a team letting an agent run with less oversight than usual should decide deliberately how much autonomy to give it here, the same judgment call as anywhere else an agent gets real write access. Permissions are inherited exactly from the connected account, so nothing outside that account's access becomes reachable through this connection.
Common questions
Team and Business. It isn't included on the Free plan. See the pricing page for the full breakdown.
Same MCP server and the same sixteen tools everywhere. The setup step differs by client: a config entry in Antigravity, one command in Claude Code's terminal, or a one-click install in Cursor. See the Claude Code and Cursor integration pages.
No. It's bound to the exact permissions of whichever account authenticated the connection, so anything outside that account's access is outside the agent's reach too.
No. GitHub sync moves and closes cards automatically from branch and merge activity. This gives the agent read and write access to tickets and the wiki directly, a separate mechanism.
Yes. Every action taken through the MCP connection lands in the same audit log as manual actions, attributed to the connected account, so it's fully reviewable afterward.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required