Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Vancouver
Vancouver's game studios and SaaS teams alike run production pipelines that depend on knowing what's actually built, not what a card claims. ShipSprint's boards get that answer from GitHub, not a status field someone forgot.
A pipeline is only as honest as its slowest update
Vancouver's game and VFX studios run production pipelines where a bottleneck in review can quietly stall everything behind it, and the SaaS and fintech teams sharing the city's tight office space run ordinary two-week sprints under the same pressure to ship on schedule. Both groups depend on a board that tells the truth, and both run into the same failure: an engineer or artist finishes a task, moves on to the next one, and the card sits untouched because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority in the moment.
That gap matters more in a production pipeline than almost anywhere else in software, since a stalled review stage that nobody notices until the burndown catches up can cost a studio real schedule. A chart built on stale manual updates isn't just inaccurate, it's actively hiding the bottleneck it's supposed to reveal.
ShipSprint's engineering boards take their status from GitHub directly. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so a producer or lead sees the real bottleneck the day it appears, not weeks later.
Built around merge history, not memory
The same mechanics that keep a milestone honest work just as well for a SaaS team's ordinary two-week sprint.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board on its own, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card automatically, so a stalled review stage shows up on the board the day it happens.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build from actual merge history, catching a bottleneck before it costs a milestone.
Per-column WIP limits stop a pipeline from silently filling up with half-finished work behind a slow stage.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace, so a milestone drifting off track shows up weeks before the date arrives.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint or milestone reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the actual code before the real conversation starts, and that reconciliation eats into time a distributed studio, spread across the North Shore, Burnaby and further into the Fraser Valley, can't easily get back with a hallway conversation. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step disappears.
A built-in wiki holds the reasoning a burndown chart can't, why a technical or pipeline decision got made, with page history that keeps it findable long after the person who made the call has moved teams. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, a fact about invoicing rather than a claim to being local. Support is based in India, most of a day removed from Pacific time, and the product is built around that gap: forecasts calculate themselves as sprints close, and a blocker routes to the right teammate without needing a live call at an odd hour.
Questions from Vancouver dev teams
Yes. Per-column WIP limits and velocity-based forecasting work the same way whether the unit of work is a shot, a build or a ticket. The board isn't games-specific, but the same mechanics that keep a production pipeline honest work just as well for a SaaS team's ordinary two-week sprint.
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking, ever. What's tracked is work delivered and hours logged by the person who worked them, visible to that person on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Prices are quoted and charged in rupees, and your card converts to Canadian dollars at whatever rate applies on the day, the same as any other foreign-currency charge. At current rates it's a fraction of what most North American project tools charge per seat.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, for up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required