Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Calgary
Calgary's engineering software teams inherited a downtown culture built on hard numbers and capital-project discipline. ShipSprint's burndown comes from GitHub merge history, not from an optimistic status update.
A forecast that's actually a calculation, not a defended guess
Calgary's tech and engineering software teams grew up next to an energy sector that plans capital projects in years and demands numbers that hold up to scrutiny, a culture with a low tolerance for a schedule nobody can defend with data. That same discipline rarely reaches the sprint board itself, where the usual, quiet failure plays out regardless of industry: an engineer finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across the column wasn't top of mind.
A burndown chart built on that lag is, in effect, an opinion presented as data, which is exactly the kind of imprecision a Calgary team steeped in capital-project rigor would flag immediately in any other context.
ShipSprint's boards close that gap automatically instead of asking for more discipline. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so the number behind a sprint is a calculation from real activity, the same standard Calgary already applies to a capital budget.
Built around merge history, not memory
Numbers built from real activity, the discipline a commodity-driven economy already expects from a budget.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so the board tracks the code rather than a status field somebody clicked.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a number built from data rather than optimism.
Per-column WIP limits stop a board from carrying more in-flight work than the team can actually finish, planned against real capacity.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace, so a date at risk shows up weeks before it's due, not the day it slips.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo before the actual conversation starts, which is exactly the kind of unverified number Calgary teams have plenty of experience distrusting from other contexts. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that reconciliation step disappears entirely.
A built-in wiki holds the reasoning a burndown chart can't, why an architecture decision got made, with page history that survives past the person who made the call. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, a plain fact about invoicing rather than a claim to being local to Alberta. Support is based in India, roughly half a day removed from Mountain time, and the product is built around that gap: forecasts and the Monday digest generate themselves, and a blocker routes to the right teammate without needing a live call at an inconvenient hour.
Questions from Calgary dev teams
It's calculated from completed sprints, specifically merged pull requests tied to cards, not from initial estimates or a target set at kickoff. As each sprint closes, the forecast updates against what the team actually delivered, so it gets more reliable the longer the team has been using it.
No, by design. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work outcomes and hours logged by the person who worked them, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Prices are set and charged in rupees, and your card converts to Canadian dollars at the rate that applies on the day, the same as any other foreign-currency charge. At current rates a seat runs well below most Canadian and US project tools.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required