Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Ottawa
Ottawa's tech sector grew up around federal procurement, where a record that holds up to scrutiny matters as much as speed. ShipSprint's boards build that record from GitHub merge history, not from a card someone forgot to update.
A sprint board that would survive being asked about later
An Ottawa engineering team, shaped by decades of government-adjacent contracts running through Kanata's tech park, is used to documentation requirements most startups elsewhere never think about. That habit rarely extends to the sprint board itself, which tends to fail the same quiet way everywhere: an engineer finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority in the moment.
A burndown chart built on that lag doesn't hold up if someone later asks "how did we get here." For a team used to procurement cycles and formal process, that's a strange gap to leave unaddressed in the one tool that's supposed to track delivery.
ShipSprint closes it automatically. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated directly from that merge history, so the record exists whether or not anyone thought to ask for it, which matters in a city where someone eventually does.
Built around merge history, not memory
A record that exists automatically, not one that gets reconstructed the week it's finally asked for.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so the board tracks the code, traceable back to the merge itself.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a record that holds up to scrutiny later.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox keep new requests planned against real capacity, with a visible, auditable trail.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own completed sprints, so a date at risk surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo, exactly the kind of manual verification a documentation-heavy Ottawa team is otherwise trained to design out of a process. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step is gone before the review even starts.
A built-in wiki keeps decisions next to the work they affect, with page history rather than a document that quietly changes with no trace of the previous version, and any sentence on a page can turn into a task without retyping it elsewhere. None of this turns ShipSprint into compliance software on its own, and it isn't marketed as one. It's a project board that happens to keep a clean, exportable trail of what shipped and when, which is a smaller and more honest claim than a certification would be.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, a fact about invoicing, not a claim to Canadian federal presence or clearance. Support is based in India rather than Canada, and teams with formal security clearance or procurement requirements should treat this as general-purpose commercial software, not a fit for classified work.
Questions from Ottawa dev teams
No. ShipSprint holds no government security clearance or certification, and shouldn't be used for classified or clearance-gated work. It's commercial project management software with a burndown built from real merge history and a full audit log, which is a different thing from formal accreditation.
No, by design. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work outcomes and hours logged by the person who worked them, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Prices are set and charged in rupees, and your card converts to Canadian dollars at whatever rate applies on the day. At current rates a seat comes in well below most Canadian project tools.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required