Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Edinburgh
Edinburgh's fintechs, many founded by people who cut their teeth in the financial institutions around Charlotte Square, expect a clean record of what shipped and when. ShipSprint's boards get that record from GitHub, not from a card someone forgot to drag.
An engineering team that needs its own board to be trustworthy
An Edinburgh fintech engineering team is used to being asked to prove things, what shipped, when, and who approved it, because someone eventually asks, whether that's an investor, a partner bank, or a regulator down the line. That habit of wanting a clean record rarely extends to the sprint board itself, which usually runs on the same quiet failure every engineering team knows: a card sits in "in progress" because the person who finished the work moved straight to the next task without dragging it across.
A burndown chart built on that kind of lag is a chart of who remembered to update a field, not a chart of what got delivered, and that's a strange gap for a team that otherwise takes its own audit trail seriously.
ShipSprint closes that gap the same way it handles everything else: automatically, not by asking people to be more careful. A branch tied to a card moves it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so the trail is accurate by construction rather than reconstructed for a review.
Built around merge history, not memory
Mechanics that give an audit-conscious team a board that doesn't need separate verification.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so a card marked done is a card that's actually shipped, traceable back to the merge.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, not from a status someone remembered to update.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox keep sprint speed and a clean, honest board from being a trade-off.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from real velocity as sprints close, giving a real answer when a partner or investor asks for one.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
The usual sprint review opens with someone reconciling the board against the repo, which is exactly the kind of manual verification step a fintech team otherwise tries to design out of everything it builds. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that reconciliation disappears, and the review starts with the actual sprint.
A built-in wiki keeps decisions next to the work they affect, with page history, useful for a team that already expects its own product to leave a clean trail and wants the same from the tool it plans in. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly. Worth being direct: none of this is a compliance certification, and ShipSprint doesn't claim one. It's a project board with a clean, automatic trail, which is a smaller and more honest claim.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in India, and billed in rupees. That's a fact about where the company is based, not a claim of local UK presence.
Questions from Edinburgh dev teams
No. ShipSprint is a project management tool, not a regulated financial services product, and doesn't claim any sector-specific certification. What it does provide is a board whose burndown and cycle-time data come directly from merge history, and an audit log on every administrative action, which is a product feature rather than a compliance claim.
No. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking. Only delivered work and hours the person logged themselves. Scorecards are visible to the person they describe and adjusted for approved leave.
It's a fact about the vendor, not a regulatory issue in itself: ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., an India-based company, and charges are processed in INR, converted by your card provider at their rate at the time. No VAT is charged or handled on our end, so confirm with your finance team how that's treated internally.
Free for up to five users and two projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Every paid plan starts with a 14-day full-access trial, no card required. Full pricing is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required