Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in São Paulo
An engineering team along Faria Lima's fintech corridor can lose an hour just crossing the city to check on something. ShipSprint's boards answer "where are we" from GitHub, not from a card someone forgot to drag.
A city too big for "just walk over and ask"
A São Paulo engineering team working the fintech and finance corridor along Faria Lima already knows that crossing the city to check on something can eat an hour each way, which makes "just walk over and ask" a bad plan even inside the same company. What that same team often doesn't account for is that its own sprint board carries a version of the same problem: an engineer finishes a task, moves to the next one, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority. A burndown chart built on that lag is unreliable in exactly the way a team already spread across a huge metro area can least afford.
That gap matters more for fintech and financial-services engineering specifically, where a release that slips has knock-on effects well beyond the engineering org, and a lead needs a real number, not a chart nobody's checked against the actual code.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, so a lead gets a trustworthy answer without crossing the city, or even the room, to get it.
Built around merge history, not memory
Mechanics that answer "where are we" without anyone crossing the city to find out.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required to reflect that work has started.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so the board tracks the code rather than a status field someone clicked.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a real number a risk or product lead can rely on.
Per-column WIP limits keep a fast-moving board honest about how much is genuinely in flight, rather than a graveyard of half-finished work.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own completed sprints, so a date at risk surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo before the actual conversation starts, and that reconciliation is a genuine cost in a city where getting the right people in one room already takes real effort. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step disappears, and the review starts with the sprint itself.
A built-in wiki holds the reasoning a burndown chart never shows, why an architecture decision got made, with page history that stays intact regardless of who wrote it. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly. None of this requires bank-grade certifications ShipSprint doesn't hold, and it isn't marketed as one, since disciplined planning mechanics and a compliance stamp are two different things.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in India and billed in rupees, a fact about invoicing rather than a claim to being local to Brazil. Support runs on Indian hours, a substantial distance from Brazil time, and forecasts and the digest generate themselves precisely so a team doesn't need synchronous support to keep moving.
Questions from São Paulo dev teams
No, and we're careful not to claim any we don't hold. What ShipSprint offers is disciplined planning mechanics, a burndown built from real merge history, WIP limits, forecasts from measured velocity, not a compliance stamp, and the two shouldn't be confused when deciding what a fintech engineering team actually needs.
No, by design rather than by policy. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking, only work delivered and hours logged by the person who worked them, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Yes. Prices are set and charged in rupees, and your card converts to reais at whatever rate applies on the day. At current rates a Business seat comes in well under most enterprise project tools sold in Brazil.
Free covers up to 5 users and 2 projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per user per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required