Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Santiago
Santiago's tech scene is smaller than São Paulo's or Mexico City's, but a lot of its teams are planning for headcount that could double within a year. ShipSprint's boards scale with them, without a burndown chart that quietly stops meaning anything.
A board that's honest at eight people needs to stay honest at eighty
A Santiago engineering team, often piloting a product across the region before expanding into Brazil or Mexico, tends to plan for a headcount that could double within a year, which makes early habits matter more than they would at a company staying deliberately small. The usual sprint-board failure shows up here just as it does anywhere: an engineer finishes a task, moves on to the next, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority in the moment.
That gap gets worse, not better, as a team scales fast. A burndown chart nobody's checking against reality is a small annoyance at eight people and a genuinely misleading planning tool at eighty, right when the team can least afford bad information.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly, so the mechanic doesn't need to be re-taught as the team grows. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, staying accurate whether the team is eight people or eighty.
Built around merge history, not memory
Nothing here is tied to a single office or a single country's calendar, which matters if the team doubles by hiring elsewhere next year.
A GitHub branch tied to a card advances it the instant work starts, no manual drag required regardless of team size.
A merged pull request closes its card automatically, so the board tracks the code, not a status field somebody clicked.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from actual merge history, accurate at any headcount.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox matter as much at 8 people as at 80, arguably more, since a small team has the least slack to absorb work piling up unseen.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace, so a date at risk surfaces weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo before the actual conversation starts, an avoidable cost for a distributed team already spread across the country or the region from early on. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step is gone, and the review starts with the sprint.
A built-in wiki holds the reasoning a burndown chart can't, why a decision got made, with page history intact, useful for a team where founders may be piloting across several markets at once and can't afford to lose track of why an earlier call was made. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint comes from Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., an India-based company that bills in rupees, a straightforward fact about how invoicing works rather than a claim of local presence. Support runs on Indian hours, well removed from Chile time, and forecasts and the digest generate themselves so a team doesn't need a live call to keep moving.
Questions from Santiago dev teams
No. The board works unchanged if the team doubles by hiring elsewhere next year. WIP limits, triage inbox routing and velocity-based forecasting aren't tied to a single office or a single country's calendar, so a second office joins the same workspace without any reconfiguration.
No. Engineering gets the deepest tooling, but HR, marketing and operations run on the same subscription with their own templates and vocabulary, useful for growing companies outside pure tech too.
No, by design. Screenshots, keystroke logging and activity tracking are all absent; what shows up instead is work delivered and hours logged by the person themselves, visible on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
Five users and two projects stay free permanently on the Free plan. Team costs ₹299 per user per month, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user monthly, adding forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full pricing detail lives on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required