Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Delhi
Delhi's engineering teams sit inside enterprises and consultancies where a status update usually has to survive several rounds of review. ShipSprint gives it one true source.
A board that doesn't need a sign-off to be accurate
A Delhi engineering team embedded inside a large enterprise or consulting practice inherits a specific habit from the rest of the company: decisions and updates pass through more layers of review than a typical product team ever sees. That's not dysfunction, it's how the business works. But it means a sprint board built on manual updates gets a second problem stacked on top of the first, not only does someone have to remember to drag a card, the number that reaches a director three levels up has usually been retold at every level in between.
The underlying issue is the same one every engineering team runs into: a card sitting in "In Progress" after its branch already merged, because an engineer moved on to the next ticket without stopping to update a field. In a flatter startup that's a minor annoyance. In a multi-stakeholder Delhi engineering org, that small gap gets amplified every time someone re-explains status up the chain, until the number a leadership review sees is several translations removed from what actually shipped.
ShipSprint closes the gap at the source. A branch tied to a card moves it automatically, and a merged pull request closes it without anyone touching a field. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that same merge history, so whatever gets reported up the chain, at whichever level, traces back to one accurate number instead of several retellings of an approximate one.
What actually changes on an engineering board
None of this asks a Delhi delivery team to run status meetings on top of the work it's already doing in GitHub.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances across the board automatically, without an engineer stopping to update a field between tickets.
A merged pull request closes its card, so a status reported upward traces back to a real merge, not to a manually updated field.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from actual merges, giving every layer of review the same source number.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits, and new requests land in a triage inbox instead of sitting unassigned until someone forwards them.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace as sprints close, so a date at risk surfaces before it's a line in someone else's review.
An architecture decision that survives the approval chain
A decision made three review rounds ago tends to get retold rather than referenced, and each retelling loses a little precision. ShipSprint's built-in wiki keeps a technical decision next to the work it affects, with page history showing exactly who changed what and when, and any sentence on a page can become a task without retyping it into a separate document. That matters when a decision made months ago needs to be defended, precisely, in front of an internal audit or a client review.
It also removes a specific kind of meeting: the one that exists purely to translate engineering status into something a non-technical stakeholder can act on. When the burndown chart already reflects real merge activity, that translation step stops being necessary, the number speaks for itself at whatever level it's read.
None of this depends on watching engineers more closely. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking anywhere in the product. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe, built from what merged and the hours logged, not a manager's impression relayed upward. ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in Hyderabad, so billing runs in rupees with GST-compliant invoices and support sits under Indian law.
Questions from Delhi dev teams
It sits on top. Branches and pull requests work exactly as they do today. ShipSprint reads that activity to move cards and generate burndown and cycle-time analytics, so status reported at any level traces back to the same source.
Yes, billing runs in rupees with GST-compliant invoices, and annual billing is available. Quoted prices exclude applicable taxes.
No, and that's a design commitment. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking, only work outcomes: what merged and hours the person logs themselves. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible only to the person they describe.
Free covers up to five users and two projects, permanently. Team is ₹299 per user per month, or ₹2,899 per year, up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month, or ₹6,499 per year, and adds forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required