Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Lima
A Lima team that started as five people answering client emails from a co-working space in Miraflores can end up managing several engagements before its internal process catches up. ShipSprint's boards get status from GitHub, not from a card someone forgot to move.
A board built for ten people rarely survives thirty
A Lima engineering team growing out of Peru's steadier, if smaller, services and software sector often finds real structure for the first time as it grows, rather than inheriting it from an older local industry. A shared spreadsheet or a group chat standing in for a proper board tends to work fine at ten people and stops working somewhere around thirty, and the sprint board is usually the first place that shows. An engineer finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority that day.
That gap is easy to miss at ten people, since everyone half-knows what everyone else is doing anyway. It's much harder to miss at thirty, once the board is the only place a lead can actually check status without interrupting someone.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly, so the mechanic doesn't depend on the team remembering to keep it up as headcount grows. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, accurate whether the team is ten people or thirty.
Built around merge history, not memory
Structure a small team can actually run, on by default rather than something to configure later.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required and no configuration project needed first.
A merged pull request closes its card on its own, so a lead sees exactly what shipped without asking around.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, staying accurate as the team grows past ten people.
Per-column WIP limits and a triage inbox for new requests are on by default, catching work before it piles up in someone's messages.
Delivery forecasts calculate themselves from the team's own measured pace once a few sprints have run, no manual estimating exercise required.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A lot of sprint reviews open with someone reconciling the board against the repo before the actual conversation starts, an unaffordable cost for a ten-person company that usually can't spare anyone's time for a task that doesn't touch the product or the client directly. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that step is gone.
A built-in wiki keeps decisions next to the work they affect, with page history, useful for a team that started small and needs its earliest reasoning to survive as more people join. Any sentence on a wiki page can become a task directly. For services and outsourcing work specifically, hours roll up by project and client automatically once logged, which matters as soon as a team starts billing by the hour rather than a fixed scope.
Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India, builds ShipSprint and bills every seat in rupees, a plain invoicing fact rather than any claim of being local. Support runs on Indian hours, well removed from Peru time, and nothing here depends on synchronous support to keep a team moving: forecasts and the digest generate on their own.
Questions from Lima dev teams
It works from day one. Per-column WIP limits and the triage inbox are on by default, and once a branch is linked to a card, the board mechanics run on their own without a separate configuration project. A ten-person team doesn't need to hire an operations person just to get it running.
No. Engineering gets the deepest tooling, including per-client hour rollups useful for services and outsourcing work, but HR, marketing and operations run on the same subscription with their own templates.
No, by design. There's no screenshot capture, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking, only the hours and work each person logs themselves, shown on their own scorecard and adjusted for approved leave.
The Free plan holds steady at 5 users and 2 projects with no expiry. Team runs ₹299 per user monthly, for teams up to 40. Business costs ₹599 per user per month, bringing in forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. See the pricing page for the complete breakdown.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required