Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Warsaw
A Warsaw team that doubled twice in eighteen months usually finds its board stopped telling the truth well before anyone noticed. ShipSprint's boards get status from GitHub, not from a card someone forgot to drag.
A board that worked at fifteen people rarely survives a double
Warsaw's rapid growth, visible in towers around Rondo ONZ built within the past two decades, shows up inside individual companies too: a fifteen-person team's process worked fine, and then the team doubled twice in eighteen months, and now nobody can say with confidence what's actually in progress without asking three people and cross-referencing their answers. The sprint board usually shows the strain first. An engineer finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority, and that lag gets worse, not better, as headcount grows.
A forecast based on a plan made when the team was half its current size stops meaning much fast, and fast-growing Warsaw companies tend to hit that mismatch repeatedly, every time a new cohort of hires ramps up or a reorg changes who owns what.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly, so the mechanic doesn't need to be re-taught every time the team grows. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, staying accurate through the exact growth spurt that would otherwise break a manually updated board.
Built around merge history, not memory
A number that updates itself rather than one someone has to remember to revise every time the team changes shape.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no drag required regardless of how fast the team is growing.
A merged pull request closes its card without manual board updates, so the board tracks the code, not a status field.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, accurate whether the team is fifteen people or sixty.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits so a growing team plans against real capacity, with new requests landing in a triage inbox.
ShipSprint recalculates delivery forecasts from the team's own measured velocity as each sprint closes, reflecting the team as it is today.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A sprint review that opens with someone reconciling the board against the repo gets more expensive, not less, once a company's grown too large for one person to track by memory. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that reconciliation step disappears, and a new hire or distributed team member reads the same real picture from day one without a briefing.
A built-in wiki grows alongside the headcount too, keeping decisions attached to the work they affect, with page history, so the reasoning behind a call made when the company was forty people is still findable once it's two hundred and most of the original team has moved into different roles. Any sentence on a page can become a task directly.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in India, with no Warsaw office or Polish entity. Billing is in rupees; annual billing is available, but check the current exchange rate for your budgeting and confirm VAT treatment with your own finance team, since Quantuva does not issue EU VAT-compliant invoices.
Questions from Warsaw dev teams
Most teams migrate a project at a time rather than all at once, starting with whichever board is causing the most pain. Because cards sync from GitHub automatically once linked, a board's accuracy improves as soon as branches are connected, without a manual cleanup pass first. The 14-day trial with a preloaded sample project is a reasonable way to test that on one team before committing the whole company.
No. The contracting entity is Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India, with no Polish subsidiary. Billing is in rupees rather than euros or złoty.
Yes, boards and permissions can be reorganized as teams change, which happens often during fast growth. History and past work, including the full merge-based burndown, stay attached to the board rather than disappearing when ownership shifts to a new lead.
Yes, it's per seat throughout with no long-term seat commitment required. Team is ₹299 per user per month up to 40 users, Business is ₹599 with no cap. You add or remove seats as headcount actually changes. See the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required