Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in Frankfurt
Frankfurt's banks and fintechs answer to auditors as a matter of course, and a sprint board that can't say who did what and when doesn't fit that standard. ShipSprint's burndown comes from GitHub merge history, traceable back to the merge itself.
A card marked done should be traceable, not just trusted
A Frankfurt fintech or bank engineering team works under a standard of documentation and traceability that most consumer software companies never have to think about, and a sprint board is a strange place for that standard to quietly lapse. The usual failure plays out the same way it does anywhere: an engineer finishes a task, moves on, and the card sits in "in progress" because dragging it across a column wasn't the priority. By the time an internal review asks "who approved this, and when," the answer is scattered across a chat thread and someone's memory.
That gap tends to surface at the worst possible time, exactly when an audit or a client review asks a question the board should have been able to answer on its own.
ShipSprint's boards take their status from GitHub directly, so the trail exists by construction rather than reconstructed under pressure. A branch tied to a card advances it the moment work starts. A merged pull request closes it. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that merge history, traceable back to the actual code that shipped.
Built around merge history, not memory
Evidence a review can trust the first time, not something reconstructed after the fact.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances on the board automatically, no manual status field involved.
A merged pull request closes its card without anyone updating a status field by hand, traceable back to the merge itself.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are calculated from actual merge history, a real record for a compliance-conscious release.
Per-column WIP limits keep a fast-moving board honest about how much is genuinely in flight at any given time.
Delivery forecasts calculate themselves as sprints complete, so a date drifting out of reach becomes visible weeks before it's due.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A sprint review that opens with a lead reconciling the board against the repo is exactly the kind of manual verification step a Frankfurt team otherwise tries to design out of everything it builds. When the board takes its state from GitHub directly, that reconciliation is gone before the review starts, and every administrative action, who was added, who changed a permission, gets written to a log automatically rather than reconstructed after the fact.
A built-in wiki keeps decisions live next to the work they affect, with page history rather than a chat thread that scrolls away, and any sentence on a page can become a task directly. None of this is offered as a compliance certification, and we're careful not to claim one, it's a description of what the product actually does.
ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., registered in India, with no Frankfurt office or German legal entity. Billing runs in rupees, and we don't claim EU VAT-compliant invoicing or any compliance certification we don't hold.
Questions from Frankfurt dev teams
Yes. Every administrative action is written to a log automatically, including permission changes and data exports, with who performed it and when. You can review that log at any time rather than needing to reconstruct events from memory, the same way the burndown reconstructs itself from merge history rather than manual updates.
We're not going to claim certifications we don't hold. The security overview describes exactly what's in place today, isolated tenants, admin audit logging, 2FA, so you can check it against what your procurement process actually requires.
Quantuva Technologies is registered in India and bills in rupees. We don't issue EU VAT-compliant invoices, and it's worth confirming how that works for your business with your own finance or tax advisor before signing up.
Team is ₹299 per user per month for up to 40 users. Business is ₹599 per user per month and adds forecasting, scorecards, the owner command center and single sign-on. See the pricing page for the full breakdown.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required