Project Management Software for Software Development Teams in New York
A fintech engineering floor two stories above a trading desk can't run a sprint on a board that's a guess. ShipSprint builds it from the commit, not the standup.
A board that keeps pace with a city that doesn't wait
A New York engineering team, whether it sits above a trading floor, inside a media company, or runs six client accounts for an agency, works next to people who are themselves exacting about deadlines. That raises the bar on what "on track" actually needs to mean: not an aspiration the sprint board is chasing, but something a manager can say out loud to a stakeholder and trust to still be true an hour later.
Most sprint boards can't back that up, because they depend on an engineer remembering to drag a card the instant a fix ships, in between whatever they're already debugging next. A card sitting in "In Progress" long after its branch merged isn't dishonesty, it's just what happens when updating a board loses to actually shipping the code. The burndown chart a manager pulls up before a client call ends up tracking who remembered to click something, not what the team delivered.
ShipSprint removes the step that keeps getting skipped. A branch tied to a card moves it across the board automatically the moment it's opened, and a merged pull request closes the card without anyone touching a field. Burndown and cycle-time analytics build themselves from that same merge history, so the number going into a client update is the number the repository actually produced.
What actually changes on an engineering board
None of this asks a New York dev team to run status updates on top of the work it's already doing in GitHub.
Open a branch tied to a card and it advances across the board automatically, no engineer pausing mid-fix to update a field.
A merged pull request closes its card, so "done" on the board actually means the code shipped, not that someone said so.
Burndown and cycle-time analytics are generated from actual merges, not from a chart reconstructed before a client call.
Boards carry per-column WIP limits, and new requests land in a triage inbox instead of an engineer's messages, so a sprint is planned against real capacity.
Delivery forecasts are calculated from the team's own measured pace as sprints close, so a slipping date surfaces weeks before a client hears about it.
A sprint review that doesn't start with "let me check"
A Friday review on most engineering floors opens the same way: someone pulls up the board, notices half of it doesn't match what actually shipped, and spends the first five minutes quietly reconciling a chart nobody trusted before the real conversation can start. That reconciliation, not the missed cards themselves, is the actual tax a manually updated board charges every single sprint.
When the board reads directly off GitHub activity, that opening five minutes disappears. A manager pulling up the burndown chart on a Wednesday is looking at what merged, not at what somebody remembered to click before a meeting. Five boroughs' worth of engineers splitting time between offices, client sites and commutes makes that automation matter more, not less, because there's rarely a hallway to walk down and double-check a card in person.
None of it comes at the cost of visibility elsewhere. There are no screenshots, no keystroke logging and no activity tracking anywhere in the product. Scorecards are leave-adjusted and visible to the person they describe, built from what merged and the hours logged, not from a manager's impression of who looked busy. ShipSprint is built by Quantuva Technologies Pvt. Ltd., based in India. Billing runs in rupees, invoices are provided with each charge, and support works the same way for every customer regardless of location.
Questions from New York dev teams
No, it sits on top of it. Branches move cards and merged pull requests close them, with burndown and cycle-time analytics generated from that same activity, so engineering stays in GitHub while the board reflects it automatically.
ShipSprint is built by an India-based company and bills in rupees on your card or via invoice, with annual billing available. Per-seat cost tends to land at a fraction of what most US-market project management tools charge, though check the pricing page for current numbers rather than a conversion that could go stale.
No, and that's a design decision, not a policy we could reverse. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity tracking. Just what merged and hours logged by the person who logged them, adjusted for leave.
Up to five people it's free, permanently, with two projects. Beyond that, Team runs ₹299 per user per month and Business runs ₹599, which adds forecasts, scorecards and the owner command center. Full detail, including annual pricing, is on the pricing page.
Related pages
See it on your own work.
A workspace your whole company will actually use is 60 seconds away. No card, no risk, nothing to install.
14-day full-access trial · sample project included · no card required